History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin. Vol. 3 (of 8)Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin. Vol. 3 (of 8)
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
That was a solemn time for Calvin, when in the room he occupied at
Catherine Klein's, he finished his _Institutes_. In after years pious
Christians entered her house with respect, and one of them, Peter Ramus,
being there in 1568, five years after the reformer's death, exclaimed
with emotion: 'Here were kindled the torches that shed so great a light!
Here those illustrious _Christian Institutes_ were composed; and here
Calvin gave himself up wholly to heavenly vigils!'[356]
The _Christian Institutes_ in its earliest form was a simple defence,
explaining briefly _law_, _faith_, _prayer_, _the sacraments_,
_Christian liberty_, and the nature of the _Church and State_. But the
French refugees at Geneva, and even distant protestants, continually
solicited Calvin to set forth the whole Christian doctrine in his book;
and accordingly it received numerous additions.[357]
The _Christian Institutes_ are a proof that christian love prevailed in
Calvin's mind: indeed, he wrote for the justification of _believers, his
brethren_. However, by defending the reformed, he explained and
justified the Reformation itself. What are its principles? The formative
principle of faith and of the Church is, with him as with Luther, the
sovereign Word of God; but he asserts it with more decision than his
predecessor. Calvin is anti-traditional: he will have nothing to do with
host, or font, or festivals and other ceremonies preserved by Luther. He
did not _reform_ the Church, he _re-formed_ it; he created it anew.
Zwingle also was scriptural, as opposed to tradition; yet Calvin's
theology is different from his; that of the Zurich doctor was specially
exegetic, while that of the Geneva doctor was specially dogmatic. If
from the formative principle we pass to that which theologians call the
material principle, namely, that which distinguishes the nature and very
essence of its doctrine, we find that it is at heart the same in Luther
and Calvin—gratuitous salvation; but the former, clinging to Christian
_anthropology_, laid down as a fundamental article, the justification by
faith of the regenerate man; whilst Calvin, clinging particularly to
_theology_, to the doctrine of God, proclaimed first of all, salvation
by the sovereignty of divine grace.
Calvin's polemics, in his _Institutes_, are essentially positive. Like a
master in the midst of artists, who are endeavouring to draw the same
picture, Calvin traces his outline with a bold hand, distributes the
light and shade, and succeeds in making an admirable work. And from that
time his rivals have only to look at it, to acknowledge the
imperfections of their own, with all their want of proportion and
extravagance.... Calvin destroys what is ugly, but he first creates the
beautiful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account