History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin. Vol. 3 (of 8)Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin. Vol. 3 (of 8)
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
Here the enemies persist: they claim the old doctors of the Church as
being in their favour. This was the strongest argument in the eyes of
Francis, who affected a certain respect for ancient christian
literature. Calvin was familiar with the writings of the doctors: he had
studied them night and day at Angoulême, Paris, and Basle. 'The Fathers
have been mistaken, just like other men,' he said, 'but these good and
obedient sons (the Romish friars) adore the errors of the Fathers, and
put out of sight what they have said aright, as if they had no other
care but to pick out the rubbish from among the gold.... And then they
attack us with loud clamours as despisers of the Ancients. Far from
despising them, we could prove from their testimony the greater part of
what we are now saying. But those holy persons often differ from each
other and sometimes contradict themselves. They ought not to tyrannise
over us. It is Christ alone whom we must obey wholly and without
exception. Why do not our adversaries take the Apostles for their
Fathers, since it is their landmarks and theirs only that we are
forbidden to remove? And if they desire the landmarks of the Fathers to
be observed, why do they, whenever it suits their pleasure, overleap
them so audaciously?'
Further than this, Calvin makes use of these doctors; he does not fear
them, on the contrary, he appeals to them. He calls them all up to make
them defile before the king and bear testimony against the doctrines of
Rome.
'It was a Father, Epiphanius, who said that it was a horrible
abomination to see an image of Christ or of any saint in a christian
temple.
'It was a Father, Pope Gelasius, who said that the substance of the
bread and wine dwells in the sacrament of the Holy Supper, as the human
nature dwells in our Lord Jesus Christ, united to his divine essence.
'It was a Father, Augustine, who called it a rash theory to assert any
doctrine without the clear testimony of Scripture.
'It was a Father, Paphnutius, who maintained that the ministers of the
Church ought not to be forbidden to marry, and that chastity consisted
in having a lawful wife.
'It was a Father, Augustine, who contended that the Church ought not to
be preferred to Christ, because whilst ecclesiastical judges, being men,
may be mistaken, Christ always judges righteously.... Ah! if I wished to
reckon up all the points in which the Roman doctors reject the yoke of
the Fathers, whose obedient children they call themselves, months and
years would pass away in reading the long roll.... And then they reprove
us for going beyond the ancient boundaries!'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account