History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin. Vol. 4 (of 8)Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin. Vol. 4 (of 8)
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
‘Soit en dînant, soit en soupant.’—_MS. de Lyon._
Footnote 391:
MS. du procès de Lyon, pp. 294-297.
Footnote 392:
‘Les mettent en train.’—MS. du procès de Lyon, p. 185.
Footnote 393:
Sœur Jeanne. _Levain du Calvinisme_, p. 68.
Footnote 394:
Registres du Conseil des 10, 11, 12 Juillet. Froment, _Gestes de
Genève_, pp. 62, 63. Roset MS.
Footnote 395:
‘Fort échauffé pour sa propre personne, plus que froid pour
l’église.’—Registre du Conseil du 13 Juillet; Froment, _Gestes de
Genève_, p. 63, Berne MS.
Footnote 396:
Registre du Conseil du 13 Juillet 1533.
Footnote 397:
Le Curé Besson: _Mémoires pour l’Histoire Ecclésiastique du Diocèse de
Genève_, p. 63.
Footnote 398:
Froment, _Gestes de Genève_, p. 63.
Footnote 399:
Roset MS.
Footnote 400:
Froment, _Gestes de Genève_, pp. 62, 63.
Footnote 401:
Le Curé Besson, _Mémoires pour l’Histoire Ecclésiastique du Diocèse de
Genève_, p. 63.
Footnote 402:
Briève Relation de la Révolte de la Ville de Genève. MS. in the
Archives Générales du Royaume d’Italie, paquet 14.
Footnote 403:
Letter to Lord Townsend, by the Secretary of State Chouet. Berne MSS.
vi. 57.
Footnote 404:
It was also on the 14th of July, two centuries and a half later
(1789), that the reign of the feudal system came to an end.
Footnote 405:
‘I care no more for him than for Baume,’ that is, _not at all_. This
expression owes its origin to the name of La Baume, last bishop of
Geneva. _Glossaires Genevois_ de Gaudy et de J. Humbert.
CHAPTER II.
TWO REFORMERS AND A DOMINICAN IN GENEVA.
(JULY TO DECEMBER 1533.)
The bishop had fallen from his throne, and with him had expired a
despotism which offensively usurped the liberties of the people; the
lawful magistrates once more sat in their curule chairs, with liberty
and justice at their sides. They investigated the cases of the citizens
whom Pierre de la Baume claimed to get rid of without the formality of
trial. The only man who could be accused of Wernly’s death was Pierre
l’Hoste, and he had taken refuge in the Dominican church, where the
bishop had not cared to follow him. The syndics went to the church; the
poor wretch, shaking in every limb, clung vainly to the altar, and cried
out: ‘I claim the privileges accorded to this sanctuary.’ He was
arrested and the inquiry commenced. It proved the innocence of the
imprisoned Huguenots, and showed that the disturbance in which Wernly
fell had been caused by the violence of the canon himself, who was armed
from head to foot, and had taunted his adversaries with loud cries. The
magistrates, however, thought that the blood of the victim called for
the blood of him who had shed it. Pierre l’Hoste, the carman of the
city, denied striking the fatal blow, but confessed that he had struck
Wernly: he was condemned and beheaded. All the other prisoners were
released.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account