History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 7 (of 8)Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 7 (of 8)
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
The bishops, who fully understood the importance of the moment, remained
deaf to all appeals. United with the laymen who had continued faithful
to them, they would be able to carry the vote. Their clamor increased.
The friends of the Reformation, therefore, judged it expedient to grant
part of their demands in order to save the vote. They allowed them to
draw up the compact. This seems an enormous concession, but
constitutional forms were not as yet very fully developed; and the Diet
reserved to itself the power either of amending the document or even of
rejecting it, if it did not suit it. The bishops made large use of the
power accorded to them. They stipulated, amongst other things, that they
should fulfil their functions without having to give account to any but
God alone; that every priest who should resist them should be
prosecuted; that the tithes should be restored to ecclesiastics, and
that whosoever refused to pay them should be summoned before the courts;
that the cathedrals, convents, churches, and hospitals should be given
up to the Roman clergy; and that in the next Diet a decision should be
formed respecting the restitution of such of these houses as had been
taken away from them. Nothing was stipulated about the rights of the
evangelical Church. This might be deprived of every thing, and indeed
they were already taking much from it.
The bishops brought this fatal project before the Diet and required the
members to set their seals to it. The evangelicals heard it with
astonishment, and the faithful Magnus Gjoë with the deepest emotion. He
spoke thus: ‘The bishops have inserted in this compact some provisions
which are in their favor and contrary to the decisions of the Reichstag;
and they have suppressed others which were favorable to the
evangelicals.’ Indignant at this fraud, the energetic Gjoë declared that
he would not set his seal to the instrument. Eric Baner did the same.
But the other Protestant members signed it, some of them from excessive
prudence which degenerated into weakness, others under the impression
that by granting to the Catholics what the latter regarded as necessary
to their Church, they were only pursuing the plan of freedom and balance
between the two confessions which the late king had designed. The
instrument, which was immediately published, had the force of law in the
kingdom.[336]
[Sidenote: Adjournment Of The Election.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account