History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 5: The Reformation in EnglandMerle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 5: The Reformation in England
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
[273] Oblatrabant sycophantæ. (Erasm. Ep. p. 329.) The slanderers
howled.
This irritation was not without a cause. The book, indeed, contained
nothing but Latin and Greek; but this first step seemed to augur
another--the translation of the Bible into the vulgar tongue. Erasmus
loudly called for it.[274] "Perhaps it may be necessary to conceal the
secrets of kings," he remarked, "but we must publish the mysteries of
Christ. The Holy Scriptures, translated into all languages, should be
read not only by the Scotch and Irish, but even by Turks and Saracens.
The husbandman should sing them as he holds the handle of his plough,
the weaver repeat them as he plies his shuttle, and the wearied
traveller, halting on his journey, refresh him under some shady tree
by these godly narratives." These words prefigured a golden age after
the iron age of popery. A number of Christian families in Britain and
on the continent were soon to realize these evangelical forebodings,
and England after three centuries was to endeavour to carry them out
for the benefit of all the nations on the face of the earth.
[274] Paraclesis ad lectorem pium. Consolation to the pious reader.
The priests saw the danger, and by a skilful manœuvre, instead of
finding fault with the Greek Testament, attacked the translation and
the translator. "He has corrected the Vulgate," they said, "and puts
himself in the place of Saint Jerome. He sets aside a work authorized
by the consent of ages and inspired by the Holy Ghost. What audacity!"
And then, turning over the pages, they pointed out the most odious
passages: "Look here! this book calls upon men to _repent_, instead of
requiring them, as the Vulgate does, _to do penance_!" (Matt. iv. 17.)
The priests thundered against him from their pulpits:[275] "This man
has committed the unpardonable sin," they asserted; "for he maintains
that there is nothing in common between the Holy Ghost and the
monks--that they are logs rather than men!" These simple remarks were
received with a general laugh; but the priests, in no wise
disconcerted, cried out all the louder: "He's a heretic, an
heresiarch, a forger! he's a goose[276] ... what do I say? he's a very
antichrist!"
[275] Quam stolide debacchati sunt quidam e suggestis ad populum.
(Erasm. Ep. p. 1193.) How stupidly some of them raved to the people
out of their pulpits.
[276] Nos clamitans esse grues (_cranes_) et bestias. (Ibid. p. 914.)
Calling out that we are cranes and brutes.
[Sidenote: THE PRIEST'S ATTACK AT COURT.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account