History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 5: The Reformation in EnglandMerle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 5: The Reformation in England
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
Where should he go? Not to England; he must complete his task before
all things. Could he be in Luther's neighbourhood and not desire to
see him? He needed not the Saxon reformer either to find the truth,
which he had already known at Oxford, or to undertake the translation
of the Scriptures, which he had already begun in the vale of the
Severn. But did not all evangelical foreigners flock to Wittemberg? To
remove all doubt as to the interview of the reformers, it would be
desirable perhaps to find some trace at Wittemberg[525] either in the
university registers or in the writings of the Saxon reformers. Yet
several contemporaneous testimonies seem to give a sufficient degree
of probability to this conference. Foxe tells us: "He had an interview
with Luther and other learned men of that country."[526] This must
have been in the spring of 1525.
[525] I requested a German divine to investigate this matter, but his
researches were unsuccessful.
[526] Mr. Anderson, in his excellent work (Annals of the English
Bible, vol. i. p. 47) disputes the interview between these two
reformers, but his arguments do not convince me. We can understand how
Luther, at that time busily engaged in his dispute with Carlstadt,
does not mention Tyndale's visit in his letters. But, besides Foxe,
there are other contemporaneous authorities in favour of this fact.
Cochlæus, a German well informed on all the movements of the
reformers, and whom we shall presently see on Tyndale's traces, says
of him and Roye: "Duo Angli apostatæ, _qui aliquamdiu fuerant
Vuitenbergæ_." Two English apostates, who had been for a while at
Wittemberg. (p. 123). And Sir Thomas More, having said that Tyndale
had gone to see Luther, Tyndale was content to reply: "When Mr. More
saith Tyndale was confederate with Luther, that is not truth." Answer
to Sir Thos. More's Dialogue, p. 147 (Park. Soc.) He denied the
_confederation_, but not the _visit_. If Tyndale had not seen Luther,
he would have been more explicit, and would probably have said that he
had never even met him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account