History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 2 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal EngineersConnolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
History
History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 2 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal Engineers
Connolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
Great Britain. Army. Royal Sappers and Miners
Some young officers—sportive yet enterprising—hearing of the nearness
of the Russians to our works, paid a visit to the lodgment, bringing
with them loaded soda-water bottles prepared with fuzes. As occasion
served they lighted these improviséd grenades, and threw them among
the enemy’s riflemen in the pit. The effect was to increase the fire
on the sappers and retard the work. In self-defence the sergeant was
compelled to report the annoyance, and the General of the trenches
gave orders that none should enter the pits except on duty.
A Polish refugee, belonging to a fusilier regiment, also came to the
screen under the auspices of the young officers aforesaid. A hole was
made for him to speak through, and addressing the Russians in their
own language, his jargon was discourteously treated with laughter and
a few angry shots. Renewing the interview the fusilier, after saying
some extravagant things to induce the riflemen to desert, concluded by
intimating “they were great fools to remain where they were.” Another
volley was the result of this candid but indiscreet communication; and
of course the Pole was forthwith expelled from the trench.
Footnote 181:
This suggests the mention of a brief conversation which occurred one
day between Colonel Shadforth and lance-corporal Jenkins. “How is it,”
asked the Colonel, “that so few sappers die?” “They hav’nt time,”
replied the corporal; “there’s too much work for them to do in the
trenches!” A stiff glass of grog from the officer’s canteen was the
result of Jenkins’s rejoinder, which would have been strictly true,
had the question been asked with respect to the primitive state of the
sapper camp.
Footnote 182:
Sir John Burgoyne in letter to the ‘Times,’ May, 1855.
Footnote 183:
The means taken to preserve the engineer mules was referred to in the
Second Report of Sir John McNeill and Colonel Tulloch to the War
Minister, as an instance of what other troops might have done had they
exercised common “promptitude or ingenuity.” It afterwards became a
vexed question, and a Court of Enquiry, conducted by seven
distinguished General Officers, sat for many weeks at Chelsea
Hospital, to ascertain, among other matters, whether any blame was
fairly attributable to the officers in chief command for neglecting
the use of expedients to save the horses. The enquiry terminated fully
exculpating the officers.
1855.
16th May-7th June.
SIEGE OF SEBASTOPOL.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account