“If we would have the whole rule of Christian faith and
practice, we must not be content with those scriptures which
Timothy knew from his infancy, that is, with the Old Testament
alone; nor yet with the New Testament, without taking along
with it the traditions of the apostles, and the interpretation
of the church, to which the apostles delivered both the book
and the true meaning of it.”[435]
It is certain that the first-day Sabbath cannot be sustained by the
first of these rules; for the word of God says nothing respecting such
an institution. The second of these rules is necessarily adopted by all
those who advocate the sacredness of the first day of the week. For the
writings of the fathers and the traditions of the church furnish all the
testimony which can be adduced in support of that day. To adopt the first
rule is to condemn the first-day Sabbath as a human institution. To adopt
the second is virtually to acknowledge that the Romanists are right; for
it is by this rule that they are able to sustain their unscriptural
dogmas. Mr. W. B. Taylor, an able anti-Sabbatarian writer, states this
point with great clearness:—
“The triumph of the consistent Roman Catholic over all
observers of Sunday, calling themselves Protestants, is indeed
complete and unanswerable.... It should present a subject
of very grave reflection to Christians of the reformed and
evangelical denominations, to find that no single argument or
suggestion can be offered in favor of Sunday observance, that
will not apply with equal force and to its fullest extent in
sustaining the various other ‘holy days’ appointed by ‘the
church.’”[436]
Listen to the argument of a Roman Catholic:—
“The word of God commandeth the seventh day to be the Sabbath
of our Lord, and to be kept holy: you [Protestants] without any
precept of Scripture, change it to the first day of the week,
only authorized by our traditions. Divers English Puritans
oppose against this point, that the observation of the first
day is proved out of Scripture, where it is said ‘the first day
of the week.’[437] Have they not spun a fair thread in quoting
these places? If we should produce no better for purgatory
and prayers for the dead, invocation of the saints, and the
like, they might have good cause indeed to laugh us to scorn;
for where is it written that these were Sabbath days in which
those meetings were kept? Or where is it ordained they should
be always observed? Or, which is the sum of all, where is it
decreed that the observation of the first day should abrogate
or abolish the sanctifying of the seventh day, which God
commanded everlastingly to be kept holy? Not one of those is
expressed in the written word of God.”[438]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account