The reasons offered by the early fathers for neglecting the observance
of the Sabbath show conclusively that they had no special light on the
subject by reason of living in the first centuries, which we in this
later age do not possess. The fact is, so many of the reasons offered by
them are manifestly false and absurd that those who in these days discard
the Sabbath, do also discard the most of the reasons offered by these
fathers for this same course. We have also learned from such of the early
fathers as mention first-day observance, the exact nature of the Sunday
festival, and all the reasons which in the first centuries were offered
in its support. Very few indeed of these reasons are now offered by
modern first-day writers.
But some of the fathers bear emphatic testimony to the perpetuity of the
ten commandments, and make their observance the condition of eternal
life. Some of them also distinctly assert the origin of the Sabbath at
creation. Several of them moreover either bear witness to the existence
of Sabbath-keepers, or bear decisive testimony to the perpetuity and
obligation of the Sabbath, or define the nature of proper Sabbatic
observance, or connect the observance of the Sabbath and first day
together. Let us now hear the testimony of those who assert the authority
of the ten commandments. Irenæus asserts their perpetuity, and makes them
a test of Christian character. Thus he says:—
“For God at the first, indeed, warning them [the Jews] by
means of _natural precepts_, which _from the beginning he had
implanted in mankind_, that is, by means of _the_ DECALOGUE
(_which, if any one does not observe, he has no salvation_),
did then demand nothing more of them.”[661]
This is a very strong statement. He makes the ten commandments the law
of nature implanted in man’s being at the beginning; and so inherited
by all mankind. This is no doubt true. It is the presence of the carnal
mind or law of sin and death, implanted in man by the fall, that has
partially obliterated this law, and made the work of the new covenant a
necessity.[662] He again asserts the perpetuity and authority of the ten
commandments:—
“Preparing man for this life, the Lord himself did speak in
his own person to all alike the words of the Decalogue: and
therefore, in like manner, do they remain permanently with us,
receiving, by means of his advent in the flesh, extension and
increase, but not abrogation.”[663]
By the “extension” of the decalogue, Irenæus doubtless means the
exposition which the Saviour gave of the meaning of the commandments in
his sermon on the mount.[664] Theophilus speaks in like manner concerning
the decalogue:—
“For God has given us a law and holy commandments; and _every
one_ who _keeps_ these _can be saved_, and, obtaining the
resurrection, can inherit incorruption.”[665]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account