The proposition to be proved is this: The Gentile Christians did not
observe the Sabbath. The proof is found in the following fact: The
churches of Bithynia assembled on a stated day for the celebration of
divine worship. It is seen therefore that the conclusion is gratuitous,
and wholly unauthorized by the testimony.[712] But this instance shows
the dexterity of Mosheim in drawing inferences, and gives us some
insight into the kind of evidence which supports some of these sweeping
statements in behalf of Sunday. Who can say that this “stated day” was
not the very day enjoined in the fourth commandment? Of the Sabbath and
first day in the early ages of the church, Coleman speaks as follows:—
“The last day of the week was strictly kept in connection with
that of the first day, for a long time after the overthrow of
the temple and its worship. Down even to the fifth century the
observance of the Jewish Sabbath was continued in the Christian
church, but with a rigor and solemnity gradually diminishing
until it was wholly discontinued.”[713]
This is a most explicit acknowledgment that the Bible Sabbath was long
observed by the body of the Christian church. Coleman is a first-day
writer, and therefore not likely to state the case too strongly in behalf
of the seventh day. He is a modern writer, but we have already proved his
statements true out of the ancients. It is true that Coleman speaks also
of the first day of the week, yet his subsequent language shows that it
was a long while before this became a sacred day. Thus he says:—
“During the early ages of the church it was never entitled
‘the Sabbath,’ this word being confined to the seventh day of
the week, the Jewish Sabbath, which, as we have already said,
continued to be observed for several centuries by the converts
to Christianity.”[714]
This fact is made still clearer by the following language, in which this
historian admits Sunday to be nothing but a human ordinance:—
“No law or precept appears to have been given by Christ or the
apostles, either for the abrogation of the Jewish Sabbath, or
the institution of the Lord’s day, or the substitution of the
first for the seventh day of the week.”[715]
Coleman does not seem to realize that in making this truthful statement
he has directly acknowledged that the ancient Sabbath is still in full
force as a divine institution, and that first-day observance is only
authorized by the traditions of men. He next relates the manner in which
this Sunday festival which had been nourished in the bosom of the church
usurped the place of the Lord’s Sabbath; a warning to all Christians of
the tendency of human institutions, if cherished by the people of God, to
destroy those which are divine. Let this important language be carefully
pondered. He speaks thus:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account