“They can say a great part of the Old and New Testaments
by heart. They despise the decretals, and the sayings and
expositions of holy men, and only cleave to the text of
Scripture.... [They say] that the doctrine of Christ and
the apostles is sufficient to salvation, without any church
statutes and ordinances. That the traditions of the church
are no better than the traditions of the Pharisees; and that
greater stress is laid on the observation of human traditions
than on the keeping of the law of God. Why do you transgress
the law of God by your traditions?... They contemn all
approved ecclesiastical customs which they do not read of in
the gospel, as the observation of Candlemas, Palm Sunday, the
reconciliation of penitents, the adoration of the cross on
Good Friday. They despise the feast of Easter, and all other
festivals of Christ and the saints, because of their being
multiplied to that vast number, and say that one day is as
good as another, and work upon holy days, where they can do it
without being taken notice of.”[888]
Dr. Allix quotes a Waldensian document of A. D. 1100, entitled the “Noble
Lesson,” and remarks:—
“The author upon supposal that the world was drawing to an
end, exhorts his brethren to prayer, to watchfulness, to a
renouncing of all worldly goods....
“He sets down all the judgments of God in the Old Testament
as the effects of a just and good God; and in particular the
decalogue as a law given by the Lord of the whole world. He
repeats the several articles of the law, not forgetting that
which respects idols.”[889]
Their religious views are further stated by Allix:—
“They declare themselves to be the apostles’ successors,
to have apostolical authority, and the keys of binding and
loosing. They hold the church of Rome to be the whore of
Babylon, and that all that obey her are damned, especially
the clergy that are subject to her since the time of Pope
Sylvester.... They hold that none of the ordinances of the
church that have been introduced since Christ’s ascension
ought to be observed, as being of no worth; the feasts, fasts,
orders, blessings, offices of the church and the like, they
utterly reject.”[890]
A considerable part of the people called Waldenses bore the significant
designation of _Sabbati_, or _Sabbatati_, or _Insabbatati_. Mr. Jones
alludes to this fact in the following words:—
“Because they would not observe saints’ days, they were falsely
supposed to neglect the Sabbath also, and called _Insabbatati_
or _Insabbathists_.”[891]
Mr. Benedict makes the following statement:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account