“But the Cathari or Puritans were not the only sect which,
during the twelfth century, appeared in opposition to the
superstition of the church of Rome. About the year 1110,
in the south of France, in the provinces of Languedoc and
Provence, appeared Peter de Bruys, preaching the gospel of the
kingdom of Heaven, and exerting the most laudable efforts to
reform the abuses and remove the superstition which disfigured
the beautiful simplicity of the gospel worship. His labors
were crowned with abundant success. He converted a great
number of disciples to the faith of Christ, and after a most
indefatigable ministry of twenty years’ continuance, he was
burned at St. Giles, a city of Languedoc in France, A. D.
1130, by an enraged populace, instigated by the clergy, who
apprehended their traffic to be in danger from this new and
intrepid reformer.”[918]
That this body of French Christians, who, in the very midnight of the
Dark Ages witnessed for the truth in opposition to the Romish church,
were observers of the ancient Sabbath is expressly certified by Dr.
Francis White, lord bishop of Ely. He was appointed by the king of
England to write against the Sabbath in opposition to Brabourne, who had
appealed to the king in its behalf. To show that Sabbatic observance is
contrary to the doctrine of the Catholic church—a weighty argument with
an Episcopalian—he enumerates various classes of heretics who had been
condemned by the Catholic church for keeping holy the seventh day. Among
these heretics he places the Petrobrusians:—
“In St. Bernard’s days it was condemned in the
Petrobruysans.”[919]
We have seen that, according to Catholic writers, the Cathari held to the
observance of the seventh day. Dr. Allix confirms the statement of Dr.
White that the Petrobrusians observed the ancient Sabbath, by stating
that the doctrines of these two bodies greatly resembled each other.
These are his words:—
“Petrus Cluniacensis has handled five questions against the
Petrobrusians which bear a great resemblance with the belief of
the Cathari of Italy.”[920]
The Sabbath-keepers in the eleventh century were of sufficient importance
to call down upon themselves the anathema of the pope. Dr. Heylyn says
that,
“Gregory, of that name the seventh [about A. D. 1074],
condemned those who taught that it was not lawful to do work on
the day of the Sabbath.”[921]
This act of the pope corroborates the testimonies we have adduced in
proof of the existence of Sabbath-keepers in the Dark Ages. Gregory the
Seventh was one of the greatest men that ever filled the papal chair.
Whatever class he anathematized was of some consequence. Gregory wasted
nothing on trifles.[922]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account