To celebrate the work of redemption by resting from labor on the first
day of the week after six days of toil, it should be true that our
Lord accomplished the work of human redemption in the six days prior
to that of his resurrection, and that he rested on that day from the
work, blessing it, and setting it apart for that reason. Yet not one of
these particulars is true. Our Lord’s whole life was devoted to this
work. He rested temporarily from it indeed over the Sabbath following
his crucifixion, but resumed the work on the morning of the first day of
the week, which he has never since relinquished, and never will, until
its perfect accomplishment in the resurrection of the saints and the
redemption of the purchased possession. Redemption, therefore, furnishes
no plea for a change of the Sabbath; its own memorials being quite
sufficient, without destroying that of the great Creator. And thus the
third pillar in the temple of first-day sacredness, like the other parts
of that structure which have been already examined, is found to be a
thing of the imagination only.
A fourth pillar in this temple is taken from an ancient prophecy in which
it is claimed that the Christian Sabbath was foretold:—
“The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone
of the corner. This is the Lord’s doing; it is marvelous in our
eyes. This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice
and be glad in it.”[330]
This text is considered one of the strongest testimonies in support of
the Christian Sabbath. Yet it is necessary to assume the very points
that this text is supposed to prove. 1. It is assumed that the Saviour
became the head of the corner by his resurrection. 2. That the day of
his resurrection was made the Christian Sabbath in commemoration of
that event. 3. And that this day thus ordained should be celebrated by
abstinence from labor, and attendance upon divine worship.
To these extraordinary assumptions it is proper to reply: 1. There is
no proof that Jesus became the head of the corner on the day of his
resurrection. The Scriptures do not mark the day when this event took
place. His being made head of the corner has reference to his becoming
the chief corner stone of that spiritual temple composed of his people;
in other words, it has reference to his becoming head of that living
body, the saints of the Most High. It does not appear that he assumed
this position until his ascension on high, where he became the chief
corner stone in Zion above, elect and precious.[331] And hence there
is no evidence that the first day of the week is even referred to in
this text. 2. Nor is there the slightest evidence that that day or any
other day was set apart as the Christian Sabbath in memory of Christ’s
resurrection. 3. Nor can there well be found a more extraordinary
assumption than that this text enjoins the Sabbatic observance of the
first day of the week!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account