History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919Reid, William
History
History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919
Reid, William
United Co-operative Baking Society, Ltd., Glasgow
During this period the extensions were neither so numerous nor so
extensive as in that which immediately preceded it, for the increase in
trade did not continue at a rate quite so rapid, but, nevertheless,
several rather important extensions were made. Entry into the workshops,
which were in course of completion in the summer of 1898, was secured in
the autumn of that year, and to the new stables shortly afterwards, and
about that time it was agreed to extend the biscuit factory and to
utilise the old stable building, after reconstruction, as a biscuit
warehouse and packing department. A considerable number of new machines
were also purchased, these including fourteen or fifteen
“dough-dividers” of a new pattern, manufactured by Werner, Pfleiderer &
Perkins Ltd., at a cost of over £200 each, and a machine for the
manufacture of sugar wafers. Three new travelling ovens were also
procured for the biscuit factory. At the June 1899 quarterly meeting
power was given to complete the South York Street building, operations
on which had been suspended for nearly two years. At a later period it
was agreed to roof in the north end of the courtyard and build a new
reel oven there. It was also decided to increase the accommodation for
the oatcake factory, so that the number of hot-plates might be increased
from 80 to 140.
A proposal which occasioned some discussion at one or two of the general
meetings of the Society was that of the directors to begin a provident
fund for the employees. A number of employees had a sick benefit fund of
their own, but it was proving inadequate to meet the demands on it, and
those in charge approached the directors for assistance. This was
granted, but, as the directors recognised that unless it was placed on a
more or less compulsory basis it was not likely to secure the necessary
stability, they had several consultations with representatives of the
employees, and then took a ballot vote of the whole of the employees on
the proposals which were submitted to them. This vote showed a majority
of three to one of the employees in favour of the scheme, which was then
brought before the delegates for their consideration and approval.
Permission to hold a special meeting of the Society for the purpose of
altering the rules to permit of a provident fund for the employees being
established was granted, but at the special meeting the vote for the
alteration of the rules was one less than the number necessary to give
the requisite two-thirds majority, and so the proposal was defeated for
the time being.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account