History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919Reid, William
History
History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919
Reid, William
United Co-operative Baking Society, Ltd., Glasgow
to have it made as so large a proportion of the property was
unproductive at that time. They therefore decided to delay the matter
for twelve months. It was not until the end of 1888 that depreciation
was put on a satisfactory basis.
AN INVESTMENT.
It was during this period that the Scottish Co-operative Farming
Association came into being. The Bakery board were supporters of the
proposal from the first. In discussing the subject the committee took
into consideration the fact that they were spending nearly £200 a
quarter for feeding-stuffs and buttermilk for baking purposes, and they
thought that if such an association was in existence a large proportion
of these articles could be got from the farm. They agreed, therefore, to
recommend to the delegates at the quarterly meeting that a special
general meeting be held to consider the advisability of becoming members
of the Farming Association. When this meeting was held it was agreed
that £50 be invested in the funds of the association. Unfortunately,
however, the speculation did not turn out a success, as, after
struggling on for several years, the association had to succumb to
adverse circumstances.
For some considerable time there was a certain amount of looseness in
conducting the stable, and the result was that finally the committee
felt compelled to make a change there by dispensing with the services of
the foreman. There was trouble at Hill Street also for a time, but
eventually this was overcome. For some considerable time, however, both
before and after the opening of the new bakery, the complaints about the
quality of the bread, which for some years had been almost negligible,
revived, and sometimes the committee at the monthly meetings had letters
from as many as a dozen societies. The causes of complaint were various,
but seemed persistent for a time.
Once before the S.C.W.S. had thought that they had reason to complain of
the share of the U.C.B.S. trade in flour which was being put past them,
and after two or three years had passed the same subject came up again
through a deputation from the Wholesale Society waiting on the Baking
Society’s Board. The whole subject was gone into minutely, and the
Wholesale deputation were told plainly that while the U.C.B.S. directors
had every desire to trade with the Wholesale Society they could not do
so while such a discrepancy existed between the prices which the
Wholesale Society charged for flours and those at which similar flours
could be purchased elsewhere. The result of this first meeting was that
a second meeting was arranged between representatives of the two
societies, when the whole subject was investigated. Both committees, it
is stated, “received from each other much valuable information which
would be advantageous to both societies.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account