History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919Reid, William
History
History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919
Reid, William
United Co-operative Baking Society, Ltd., Glasgow
The manager had replied wishing to know on what authority Mr Mann had
taken it upon himself to state that the Society were aiders and abettors
in the action referred to; and in reply was referred to a paragraph in
the Paisley newspaper of 15th July 1883, in which the Co-operative
Baking Society, Kinning Park, was published as one of the abettors. Mr
Mann had no doubt that the statement was correct, and warned the Society
that it was necessary to attend to his former letter at once to save
future trouble. The Bakery board replied to threat by threat. If any
further communication was received from Mr Mann, the matter was to be
put into the hands of the Society’s law agent, who was to raise an
action against him for trying to extort money on false pretences, as the
Society had never paid any money to assist in the “Right of Way” case.
Nothing more seems to have been heard of the subject, for nothing
further appears in the minutes regarding it.
In August 1887 the building committee, having completed their labours,
were thanked for their services, and dissolved. The buildings, plant,
and stocks in the new bakery were insured for £16,000, while the
buildings and plant in St James Street were insured for £2,000. About
this time the directors were called on to consider some grievances under
which the employees, and particularly the vanmen, alleged that they
suffered. The first of those had reference to attendance at the stables
on Sundays. The committee made investigations, and came to the
conclusion that no grievance was suffered. Attendance on Sundays to look
after the comfort of the horses was not work, they decided, but an act
of mercy, which was not paid for anywhere. The other grievance—that the
vanmen by the nature of their work did not get regular holidays “and had
no opportunity of going to the coast with their families”—the directors
thought well founded, and they decided to allow three consecutive days
to each man in future, in addition to the holidays they at present
received; stipulating, however, that no two men were to be on holiday at
the same time.
A NEW VENTURE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account