History of the United States of America, Volume 1 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 1 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
The sentiments in which Paine gloried “steadily to have labored,” so
far as they were recent, chiefly consisted in applause of the French
Revolution, in libels on President Washington and his successor, and
in assaults on the Christian religion. Whether he was right or wrong
need not be discussed. Even though he were correct in them all, and was
entitled to higher respect than any which Jefferson could show him,
he was at that time regarded by respectable society, both Federalist
and Republican, as a person to be avoided, a character to be feared.
Among the New England churches the prejudice against him amounted to
loathing, which epithets could hardly express. Had Jefferson written
a letter to Bonaparte applauding his “useful labors” on the 18th
Brumaire, and praying that he might live long to continue them, he
would not have excited in the minds of the New England Calvinists so
deep a sense of disgust as by thus seeming to identify himself with
Paine. All this was known to him when he wrote his letter; he knew too
that Paine would be likely to make no secret of such a compliment; and
even if Paine held his tongue, the fact of his return in a national
vessel must tell the story.
Jefferson’s friends took a tone of apology about the letter to Paine,
implying that he acted without reflection. They treated the letter as
a formal civility, such as might without complaint have been extended
to Gates or Conway or Charles Lee,[76]--a reminiscence of Revolutionary
services which implied no personal feeling. Had Jefferson meant no more
than this, he would have said only what he meant. He was not obliged to
offer Paine a passage in a ship-of-war; or if he felt himself called
upon to do so, he need not have written a letter; or if a letter must
be written, he might have used very cordial language without risking
the charge of applauding Paine’s assaults on Christianity, and without
seeming to invite him to continue such “useful labors” in America. No
man could express more delicate shades of sympathy than Jefferson when
he chose. He had smarted for years under the lashing caused by his
Mazzei letter, and knew that a nest of hornets would rise about him the
moment the “Maryland” should arrive; yet he wrote an assurance of his
“high esteem and affectionate attachment” to Paine, with a “sincere
prayer” that he might “long live to continue” his “useful labors.”
These expressions were either deceptive, or they proved the President’s
earnestness and courage. The letter to Paine was not, like the letter
to Mazzei, a matter of apology or explanation. Jefferson never withdrew
or qualified its language, or tried to soften its effect. “With respect
to the letter,” he wrote[77] to Paine in 1805, “I never hesitated to
avow and to justify it in conversation. In no other way do I trouble
myself to contradict anything which is said.” Believing that the clergy
would have taken his blood if the law had not restrained them, he meant
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account