History of the United States of America, Volume 2 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 2 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
AS the year 1804 began, with Louisiana annexed, the Electoral
Amendment secured, and the impeachments in prospect, the Federalists
in Congress wrought themselves into a dangerous state of excitement.
All agreed that the crisis was at hand; democracy had nearly reached
its limit; and, as Justice Chase said from the bench, peace and
order, freedom and property, would soon be destroyed. They discussed
in private what should be done; and among the New Englanders almost
all the men of weight were found to favor the policy of at least
saving New England. Of the six Federalist senators from the Eastern
States,--Plumer and Olcott of New Hampshire, Pickering and Adams of
Massachusetts, Tracy and Hillhouse of Connecticut,--all but Olcott
and Adams thought a dissolution of the Union inevitable.[101] Among
the Federalist members of the House, Roger Griswold of Connecticut
was the most active; he too was convinced that New England must
protect herself. Samuel Hunt of New Hampshire, and Calvin Goddard of
Connecticut held the same opinion. Indeed, Pickering declared that he
did not know “one reflecting Nov-Anglian” who held any other.
In the month of January, 1804, despair turned into conspiracy.
Pickering, Tracy, Griswold, Plumer, and perhaps others of the New
England delegation, agreed to organize a movement in their States
for a dissolution of the Union. They wrote to their most influential
constituents, and sketched a plan of action. In a letter to George
Cabot, Pickering recounted the impending dangers[102]:--
“By the Philadelphia papers I see that the Supreme Court judges
of Pennsylvania are to be hurled from their seats, on the
pretence that in punishing one Thomas Passmore for a contempt
they acted illegally and tyrannically. I presume that Shippen,
Yates, and Smith are to be removed by the Governor, on the
representation of the Legislature. And when such grounds are
taken in the National and State legislatures to destroy the
rights of the judges, whose rights can be safe? Why destroy
_them_, unless as the prelude to the destruction of every
influential Federalist and of every man of considerable property
who is not of the reigning sect? New judges, of characters and
tempers suited to the object, will be the selected ministers of
vengeance.”
A separation, Pickering inferred, had become necessary; but when and
how was it to be effected?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account