History of the United States of America, Volume 3 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 3 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
“In demanding that the negotiation should take place at Paris,
in making overtures to the United States minister while he has
not even received instructions from his Government, in leading
the Prince of Peace to believe that everything would be done
under the mediation of France,--you exceed the instructions
marked out for you; and such is the effect of one false step,
that it inevitably draws others after it before the system
which has been forsaken can be resumed. That Spain and the
United States should seek a reconciliation is to be desired;
but leave to them the opening of negotiation, and take only
such steps as are marked out for you,--such are his Majesty’s
orders. The United States and Spain will communicate their
intentions to each other. You cannot charge yourself with the
always embarrassing functions of an intermediary without being
formally authorized to do it; for the Government alone can know
whether this step is consistent with its interests of the moment
and with the general plan it has formed for itself.”
That the words of this despatch were taken from the Emperor’s lips
is more than likely. Talleyrand’s notes always repeated as nearly as
possible the exact expressions of his master; and the expressions of
this note were Napoleonic even in their confusion of facts and ideas.
Above all, the concluding sentence, which was probably as mysterious to
Talleyrand as to the Americans, marked the proceeding with the peculiar
stamp of Napoleon’s mind. No one but himself should judge whether the
cession of Florida was “consistent with his interests of the moment
and with the general plan he had formed for himself.” Probably for
the first time, July 12, 1806, Talleyrand learned that Napoleon had
a general plan which was inconsistent with complete reconciliation
between Spain and the United States; yet he could no longer doubt that
the same general plan had controlled the Emperor’s conduct at least as
far back as May 1. From this reticence he might infer that his own fall
approached. Another proof that his credit waned came in a form more
gracious, but not less convincing. Napoleon conferred on him an Italian
principality. The Ex-Bishop of Autun became Prince of Benevento.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account