History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Sloan desisted from his motion only after the House had shown itself
strongly inclined toward his opinion. On another point the divergence
of ideas became more marked, and Jefferson found himself obliged to
strain his influence.
In the Republican party any vote for a standing army had been hitherto
considered a crime. The Federalists in 1801 had left a force of five
thousand men; Jefferson reduced it to three thousand. The Republican
party believed in a militia, but neglected it. Throughout the Southern
States the militia was undisciplined and unarmed; but in Massachusetts,
as President Jefferson was beginning to notice, the Federalists took
much care of their State soldiery. The United States fort at Newport
was garrisoned only by goats, and the strategic line of Lake Champlain
and the Hudson River, which divided New England from the rest of
the Union, lay open to an enemy. In view of war with England such
negligence became wanton. Jefferson saw that an army must be raised;
but many of his truest followers held that militia alone could be
trusted, and that the risk of conquest from abroad was better than the
risk of military despotism at home.
For a people naturally brave, Americans often showed themselves
surprisingly unwilling to depend upon their own strength. To defy
danger, to rush into competition with every foreign rival, to take
risks without number, and to depend wholly on themselves were admitted
characteristics of Americans as individuals; but the same man who, when
left to his own resources, delighted in proving his skill and courage,
when brought within the shadow of government never failed to clamor
for protection. As a political body the American people shrank from
tests of its own capacity. “American systems” of politics, whether
domestic or foreign, were systems for evading competition. The American
system in which the old Republican party believed was remarkable for
avowing want of self-confidence as the foundation of domestic as well
as of foreign policy. The Republican party stood alone in refusing,
on principle, to protect national rights from foreign outrage; but it
defied imitation when the sacrifice of national rights was justified by
the argument that if American liberties were not abandoned to foreign
nations they would be destroyed by the people themselves. War, which
every other nation in history had looked upon as the first duty of
a State, was in America a subject for dread, not so much because of
possible defeat as of probable success. No truer Republican could be
found in Virginia than John W. Eppes, one of Jefferson’s sons-in-law;
and when the House debated in February a Senate bill for adding two
regiments to the regular army, Eppes declared the true Republican
doctrine:[164]--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account