History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Two causes saved Madison. In the first place, the opposition failed
to concentrate its strength. Neither George Clinton nor James Monroe
could control the whole body of opponents to the embargo. After
waiting till the middle of August for some arrangement to be made,
leading Federalists held a conference at New York, where they found
themselves obliged, by the conduct of De Witt Clinton, to give up the
hope of a coalition. Clinton decided not to risk his fortunes for the
sake of his uncle the Vice-President; and this decision obliged the
Federalists to put a candidate of their own in the field. They named
C. C. Pinckney of South Carolina for President, and Rufus King of New
York for Vice-President, as in 1804.
From the moment his opponents divided themselves among three
candidates, Madison had nothing to fear; but even without this good
fortune he possessed an advantage that weighed decisively in his
favor. The State legislatures had been chosen chiefly in the spring
or summer, when the embargo was still comparatively popular; and
in most cases, but particularly in New York, the legislature still
chose Presidential electors. The people expressed no direct opinion
on national politics, except in regard to Congressmen. State after
State deserted to the Federalists without affecting the general
election. Early in September Vermont elected a Federalist governor,
but the swarm of rotten boroughs in the State secured a Republican
legislature, which immediately chose electors for Madison. The
revolution in Vermont surrendered all New England to the Federalists.
New Hampshire chose Presidential electors by popular vote; Rhode
Island did the same,--and both States, by fair majorities, rejected
Madison and voted for Pinckney. In Massachusetts and Connecticut the
legislatures chose Federalist electors. Thus all New England declared
against the Administration; and had Vermont been counted as she voted
in September, the opposition would have received forty-five electoral
votes from New England, where in 1804 it had received only nine. In
New York the opponents of the embargo were very strong, and the
nineteen electoral votes of that State might in a popular election
have been taken from Madison. In this case Pennsylvania would have
decided the result. Eighty-eight electoral votes were needed for a
choice. New England, New York, and Delaware represented sixty-seven.
Maryland and North Carolina were so doubtful that if Pennsylvania had
deserted Madison, they would probably have followed her, and would
have left the Republican party a wreck.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account