History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
“That the Orders in Council did not produce the embargo, that they
were not substantially known in America when the embargo took
place,”[281] was the burden of Canning’s and Castlereagh’s constant
charge against the United States government. Canning was one of six or
eight men in the world who might with truth have said that they knew
the orders to have produced the embargo. He alone could have proved
it by publishing Erskine’s official evidence;[282] but he preferred
to support Timothy Pickering and Barent Gardenier in persuading
the world that Jefferson’s acts were dictated from Paris, and that
their only motive was the assassination of England. “Nor, sir, do I
think,” continued Canning before the whole House of Commons, “that
the Orders in Council themselves could have produced any irritation
in America.... Since the return of Mr. Rose no communication has
been made by the American government in the form of complaint, or
remonstrance, or irritation, or of any description whatever.” With
infinite industry the assertions of Pickering and Gardenier, of John
Randolph and of the Boston newspapers and pamphlets, were reprinted
and circulated in London. “Your modesty would suffer,” wrote Rose to
Pickering,[283] “if you were aware of the sensation produced in this
country by the publication of a letter from a senator of Massachusetts
to his constituents.”
Every American slander against Jefferson was welcomed in England,
until Pinkney asked Madison in disgust, “Have you prohibited the
exportation of all pamphlets which uphold our rights and honor?”[284]
The English people could hardly be blamed if they became almost
insane under the malice of these falsehoods, for no whisper of Iago
was more poisonous than Canning’s innuendoes. Believing Jefferson
to be in secret league with Napoleon, they insisted that the United
States should be punished for the treason Jefferson had planned.
Joseph Marriatt, a prominent member of Parliament, in a pamphlet[285]
published in August, reminded President Jefferson of the fate of the
late Czar Paul. The feeling of society was so bitter that by tacit
agreement America ceased to be talked about; no one ventured longer to
defend her.
In June Pinkney received instructions, dated April 30,[286]
authorizing him to offer a withdrawal of the embargo on condition
that England should withdraw the Orders in Council. In the situation
of English feeling such an offer was almost an invitation to insult,
and Pinkney would have gladly left it untouched. He tried to evade the
necessity of putting it in writing; but Canning was inexorable. From
week to week Pinkney postponed the unpleasant task. Not until August
23 did he write the note which should have been written in June. No
moment could have been more unfortunate; for only two days before,
Arthur Wellesley had defeated Junot at Vimieiro; and August 30 Junot
capitulated at Cintra. The delirium of England was higher than ever
before or since.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account