History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Joseph Story two days afterward wrote a more exact account of the
distraction which prevailed at the White House.
“The Administration are desirous of peace,” wrote Story,[321] in
confidence, December 31. “They believe that we must suffer much from
war; they are satisfied, even now, that if the embargo could be
continued for one year our rights would be acknowledged were our own
citizens only true to their own interests. They deem this continuance
impracticable, and therefore are of opinion that after midsummer
the plan must be abandoned; and war will then ensue unless the
belligerents abandon their aggressions.”
The chaos prevailing in the White House was order compared with the
condition of Congress; and there again Gallatin was forced to guide.
After listening November 8 to the President’s serene Message, the
House three days later referred the paragraphs concerning foreign
Powers to a committee with G. W. Campbell at its head. Campbell
probably consulted Madison, and his instance doubtless caused the
fruitless appeal of November 15, through Gallatin, to Jefferson.
Failing to obtain guidance from the President, Gallatin wrote a
Report, which was probably approved by Madison, and which Campbell
presented November 22 to the House. For clearness and calmness of
statement this paper, famous in its day as “Campbell’s Report,”[322]
has never been surpassed in the political literature of the United
States; but the rigorous logic of its conclusions terrified men who
could not refute and would not accept them:--
“What course ought the United States to pursue? Your committee can
perceive no other alternative but abject and degrading submission,
war with both nations, or a continuance and enforcement of the
present suspension of commerce.
“The first cannot require any discussion; but the pressure of the
embargo, so sensibly felt, and the calamities inseparable from
a state of war, naturally create a wish that some middle course
might be discovered which should avoid the evils of both and not be
inconsistent with national honor and independence. That illusion must
be dissipated; and it is necessary that the people of the United
States should fully understand the situation in which they are placed.
“There is no other alternative but war with both parties or
a continuance of the present system. For war with one of the
belligerents only would be submission to the edicts and will of
the other; and a repeal, in whole or in part, of the embargo must
necessarily be war or submission.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account