History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
“Good Heavens! Mr. Chairman, are men mad? Is this House touched with
that insanity which is the never-failing precursor of the intention
of Heaven to destroy? The people of New England, after eleven months’
deprivation of the ocean, to be commanded still longer to abandon
it! for an undefined period to hold their unalienable rights at
the tenure of the will of Britain or of Bonaparte!... I am lost in
astonishment, Mr. Chairman. I have not words to express the matchless
absurdity of this attempt. I have no tongue to express the swift and
headlong destruction which a blind perseverance in such a system must
bring upon this nation.... This embargo must be repealed. You cannot
enforce it for any important period of time longer. When I speak of
your inability to enforce this law, let not gentlemen misunderstand
me. I mean not to intimate insurrection or open defiance of them;
although it is impossible to foresee in what acts that oppression
will finally terminate which, we are told, makes wise men mad.”
Nature gave the ocean to New England, “and among a people thus
situated, thus educated, thus numerous, laws prohibiting them from
the exercise of their natural rights will have a binding effect not
one moment longer than the public sentiment supports them.”
Always assuming that the talk of war covered the plan of retaining the
embargo, Quincy allowed himself to encourage warlike ideas much more
recklessly than suited some of his party friends. He ventured to goad
the majority toward a decision which of all possible results was most
disliked by the Federalists of New England:--
“Take no counsel of fears. Your strength will increase with the
trial, and prove greater than you are now aware. But I shall be told
this may lead to war. I ask, Are we now at peace? Certainly not,
unless retiring from insult be peace, unless shrinking under the
lash be peace. The surest way to prevent war is not to fear it. The
idea that nothing on earth is so dreadful as war is inculcated too
studiously among us. Disgrace is worse. Abandonment of essential
rights is worse.”
Whatever Quincy might have been willing to accept, the party to which
he belonged wanted no war except with France, while the Republicans
were opposed to war in any shape. John Randolph did indeed hint at the
use of force, but Randolph’s opinion was never for two days the same.
Philip Barton Key of Maryland, as vehement a Federalist as Quincy,
also advised a policy which could lead only to war:--
“I would let our vessels go out armed for resistance, and if they
were interfered with I would make the _dernier_ appeal. We are able
and willing to resist; and when the moment arrives, there will be but
one heart and one hand throughout the Union.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account