History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
No sooner had the Senate, on receiving this Message, gone into
executive session than Senator Bradley of Vermont offered a Resolution
that any intercourse with Russia, such as the President suggested,
might “be carried on with equal facility and effect by other public
agents of the United States without the expense of a permanent
minister plenipotentiary;” or in case of sudden negotiations for
peace in Europe, “the permanent minister at any of the Courts thereof
may be instructed to attend on the same;” and that for these reasons
the proposed appointment was at present inexpedient and unnecessary.
After much secret debate, Senator Bradley, February 27, withdrew his
motion, and the Senate then abruptly and unanimously rejected Short’s
nomination.
The discourtesy was flagrant. As a matter of policy the new mission
might fairly be subject for argument; and the Senate had a right, if
it chose, to follow its own opinions on such a subject. Unreasonable
as was the idea of sending hither and thither the American ministers
“at any of the Courts of Europe,” when every senator knew that on the
continent of Europe America had but one minister, and even he was on
the verge of dismissal or recall; ill-judged as was the assertion that
a consular agent could carry on “with equal facility and effect” at
a Court like that of St. Petersburg a diplomatic intercourse which
would need every resource of public and private influence; narrow
as was the policy of refusing “the expense of a permanent minister
plenipotentiary” to the only nation in the world which offered her
friendship at a moment when England and France were doing their utmost
to spare America the expense of legations at London and Paris,--yet
these objections to Jefferson’s wish were such as the Senate might
naturally make, for they were the established creed of the Republican
party, and no one had done more than Jefferson himself to erect
them into a party dogma. Dislike of diplomacy was a relic of the
old colonial status when America had been dependent on Europe,--a
prejudice rising chiefly from an uneasy sense of social disadvantage.
Whenever America should become strong and self-confident, these petty
jealousies were sure to disappear, and her relations with other Powers
would be controlled solely by her wants; but meanwhile the Senate in
every emergency might be expected to embarrass the relations of the
Executive with foreign governments, and to give untenable reasons
for its conduct. That the Senate should object, could have been no
surprise to Jefferson; but that it should without even a private
explanation reject abruptly and unanimously the last personal favor
asked by a President for whom every Republican senator professed
friendship, and from whom most had received innumerable favors, seemed
an unpardonable insult. So Jefferson felt it. He wrote to Short in
accents of undisguised mortification:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account