History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
[74] Cobbett’s Debates, x. 328.
[75] Debate of Feb. 15, 1808; Cobbett’s Debates, x. 471.
[76] Debate of Feb. 15, 1808; Cobbett’s Debates, x. 485.
[77] Speech of James Stephen, March 6, 1809; Cobbett’s Debates, xiii.,
Appendix lxxvi.
[78] Debate of March 3, 1812; report in Times and Morning Chronicle of
March 4, 1812.
[79] Erskine to Madison, Feb. 23, 1808; State Papers, iii. 209.
[80] Baring’s Inquiry, pp. 14, 15.
CHAPTER V.
The curtain was about to rise upon a new tragedy,--the martyrdom of
Spain. At this dramatic spectacle the United States government and
people might have looked with composure and without regret, for they
hardly felt so deep an interest in history, literature, or art as to
care greatly what was to become of the land which had once produced
Cortes, Cervantes, and Murillo; but in the actual condition of European
politics their own interests were closely entwined with those of Spain,
and as the vast designs of Napoleon were developed, the fortunes of
the Spanish empire more and more deeply affected those of the American
Union.
General Armstrong waited impatiently at Paris while Napoleon carried
on his desperate struggle with the Emperor Alexander amid the ice and
snows of Prussia. After the battle of Eylau the American minister
became so restless that in May, 1807, he demanded passports for
Napoleon’s headquarters, but was refused. Had he gone as he wished, he
might have seen the great battle of Friedland, June 14, and witnessed
the peace of Tilsit, signed July 7, which swept away the last obstacle
to Napoleon’s schemes against Spain and America. After the peace of
Tilsit, Armstrong could foresee that he should have to wait but a short
time for the explanations so mysteriously delayed.
Except Denmark and Portugal, every State on the coast of Europe from
St. Petersburg to Trieste acknowledged Napoleon’s domination. England
held out; and experience proved that England could not be reached by
arms. The next step in the Emperor’s system was to effect her ruin by
closing the whole world to her trade. He began with Portugal. From
Dresden, July 19, he issued orders[81] that the Portuguese ports should
be closed by September 1 against English commerce, or the kingdom of
Portugal would be occupied by a combined French and Spanish army. July
29 he was again in Paris. July 31 he ordered Talleyrand to warn the
Prince Royal of Denmark that he must choose between war with England
and war with France. That the turn would next come to the United States
was evident; and Armstrong was warned by many signs of the impending
storm. August 2, at the diplomatic audience, the brunt of Napoleon’s
displeasure fell on Dreyer, the Danish minister, and on his colleague
from Portugal; but Armstrong could see that he was himself expected to
profit by the lesson. He wrote instantly to the Secretary of State.[82]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account