History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Robert Smith, doubtless believing that all his actions had been above
question or reproach, protested warmly against these charges of
unfriendliness and intrigue; but Madison, with a feminine faculty for
pressing a sensitive point, insinuated that in his opinion both the
Smiths were little better than they should be. “With respect to his
motives for dissatisfaction I acknowledged that I had been, for the
reasons given by him, much puzzled to divine any natural ones without
looking deeper into human nature than I was willing to do.” The meaning
of the innuendo was explained by Joel Barlow the following year in
the “National Intelligencer,” where he acted as Madison’s mouthpiece
in defending the Administration from Robert Smith’s attacks. One of
Smith’s complaints rested upon Macon’s bill. Barlow asked, “What gives
Mr. Smith a right at this day to proclaim himself in opposition to that
bill? Was it ever laid before the Cabinet and opinions taken? Did he
there oppose it? Did he not rather approve it, and give his vote for
every article? Did he ever utter a syllable against it till his more
acute brother discovered the commercial bearing that it would have upon
the house [of Smith and Buchanan], and concluded that their interest
required its rejection?”
Perhaps this explanation, however offensive to the Smiths, injured
them less than the other suspicion which had as much vogue as the
first,--that their conduct toward Macon’s bill was a part of their feud
against Gallatin, and proved their determination to oppose everything
he suggested. At the moment when Samuel Smith revolted against Macon’s
measure, Washington was filled with tales of quarrels in the Cabinet.
In truth, these reports were greatly exaggerated. Robert Smith had
not the capacity to develop or to pursue a difficult line of argument
even without opposition. Against Gallatin he could not, and as Madison
testified did not, open his mouth, nor did Gallatin or Madison ever
complain except of Smith’s silence in the Cabinet; but he talked freely
in society, and every one heard of battles supposed to be raging.
Walter Jones, one of the most respectable Virginia members, wrote to
Jefferson, February 19, imploring him to intervene:[144]--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account