History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
“I shall certainly vote to reduce the army of the United
States,” said Burwell of Virginia;[149] “and if the House should
decide that it will not employ the navy of the United States
in the protection of commerce, I shall certainly vote also
to reduce the naval establishment. I am perfectly convinced
that the circumstances under which I voted for the increase
of the army and navy have passed away; and as our revenue has
diminished, I shall vote for a reduction of our expenses.... So
far from considering the country in a deplorable situation, as
my colleague (Mr. Randolph) has represented it, I think that
in many points of view we have every reason to congratulate
ourselves. It is a singular phenomenon to see any nation
enjoying peace at this time. This exemption from the general lot
claims the gratitude of every man in the country. So far as I
am concerned in the affairs of the nation, I have but a single
object in view,--namely, to preserve peace; and my votes are
predicated on that ground.”
The war men voted with the peace men for reasons given by Troup of
Georgia:[150]--
“I am as well convinced of the fact as that I am now addressing
you, that the people will not consent to pay an additional
tax for the support of armies and navies raised to oppose the
injurious acts of the belligerents against our rights, after we
have abandoned those rights and dishonorably withdrawn from the
contest.”
After much contradictory talk of this kind, Nelson of Maryland told the
House that they were behaving like schoolboys.
“It is a perfect child’s game,” said he.[151] “At one session we
pass a law for raising an army, and go to expense; in another
year, instead of raising money to pay the expense by the means
in our power, we are to disband the army we have been at so
much pains to raise. We shall well deserve the name of children
instead of men if we pursue a policy of this kind.”
The warning had no perceptible weight with the House, where the peace
party were in a majority and the war party were in a passion, not with
the foreign enemy, but with their neighbors and friends. Richard M.
Johnson almost avowed that he should vote for reducing army and navy in
order to punish the men who had made them useless:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account