History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Profitable as this sweeping confiscation was, and thoroughly as
Napoleon overbore opposition in his family and Cabinet, such measures
in no way promised to retrieve the disaster his system suffered from
the defection of America. While England protected American ships in
their attempts to counteract his system in Spain, Holland, and in the
Baltic, the Emperor regarded American trade as identical with British,
and confiscated it accordingly; but by doing so he exhausted his means
of punishment, and since he could not march armies to New York and
Baltimore as he marched them to Amsterdam and Hamburg, he could only
return on his steps and effect by diplomacy what he could not effect by
force. The Act of March 1, 1809, was a thorn in his side; but the news
which arrived toward the end of June, 1810, that Congress had repealed
even that slight obstacle to trade with England made some corrective
action inevitable. The Act of May 1, 1810, struck a blow at the Emperor
such as no Power in Europe dared aim, for it threw open to British
trade a market in the United States which would alone compensate
England for the loss of her trade with France and Holland. Macon’s Act
made the Milan Decree useless.
Napoleon no sooner learned that Congress had renewed intercourse
with England and France, than he wrote an interesting note[194] to
Montalivet dated June 25, the day after he ordered his army to seize
Amsterdam.
“The Americans,” he said, “have raised the embargo on their
ships so that all American ships can leave America to come to
France; but those which should come here would be sequestered,
because all would either have been visited by English ships or
would have touched in England. It is therefore probable that no
American ship will come into our ports without being assured of
what France means to do in regard to them.”
France could evidently do one of three things,--either avowedly
maintain her decrees, or expressly revoke them, or seem to revoke them
while in fact maintaining them. The process by which Napoleon made his
choice was characteristic.
“We may do two things,” he continued,--“either declare that the
Decrees of Berlin and Milan are repealed, and replace commerce
where it formerly was; or announce that the Decrees will be
repealed September 1, if on that date the English have repealed
the Orders in Council. Or the English will withdraw their Orders
in Council, and then we shall have to ascertain whether the
situation that follows will be advantageous to us.”
Assuming that the decrees and orders were withdrawn, and American ships
admitted as neutrals, the Emperor explained how he should still enforce
his system as before:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account