History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Until half-past two o’clock in the morning of February 28 time was
consumed in these tactics,--about eighty members being present, and
the majority keeping silence. At that hour Barent Gardenier was on the
floor making another diffuse harangue, when Thomas Gholson of Virginia
called for the previous question on the last motion before the House.
According to the rules, Speaker Varnum stated the motion: “Shall the
main question be now put?” It was decided in the affirmative. Gardenier
immediately attempted to speak on the main question, when Gholson
called him to order. Then followed the _coup d’état_.
“The Speaker decided that according to the late practice of the
House it was in order to debate the main question after the
previous question had been taken. He said that this practice had
been established by the House by a decision two years ago, in
opposition to an opinion which he himself had always entertained
and had then declared. His decision on that occasion was
reversed, and he felt himself bound by that expression of the
House.”
Gholson appealed. The Speaker decided that the appeal was debatable,
but his decision was reversed by a vote of sixty-six to thirteen. The
House then, without a division, reversed his first ruling, and ordered
that thenceforth, after the motion for the previous question should
have been decided in the affirmative, the main question should not be
debated.
By this means and by persistent silence the majority put an end to
debate. When Randolph returned to the hall and heard what had been
done, he burst into reproaches that the House had disgraced itself;
but his outcry, which like his language to Eppes was attributed to
drink, received no answer except cries to order. Further resistance was
not carried to extremes; perhaps the dilatory tactics of later times
were hardly applicable to so small a body as the House of 1811, or
needed time for development; at all events the bill was forced to its
passage, and at about five o’clock on the morning of February 28 the
House passed it by a vote of sixty-four to twelve. March 2 it passed
the Senate, and was approved by the President. Of all the Republicans,
Macon alone in the House and Bradley of Vermont in the Senate voted
against it. Matthew Lyon, who also opposed it, left the House in
disgust without voting.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account