History of the United States of America, Volume 8 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 8 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
“If anything could revolt our citizens against the war,” wrote
Jefferson, November 28,[366] “it would be the extravagance with
which they are about to be taxed.... The taxes proposed cannot
be paid. How can a people who cannot get fifty cents a bushel
for their wheat, while they pay twelve dollars a bushel for
their salt, pay five times the amount of taxes they ever paid
before? Yet this will be the case in all the States south of the
Potomac.”
If any conclusion was intended to be drawn from the official
return[367] sent to Congress, October 13, of internal taxes received
to that date in each State, the evil predicted by Jefferson seemed
already to exist. In Massachusetts, of taxes to the amount of
$200,000, accrued for the first two quarters of the year, $170,000 had
been received before October 10. In New York $393,000 had accrued, and
$303,000 had been received; thus New York was nearly one fourth in
arrears. Pennsylvania was worse; of $470,000 accrued the government
had received $280,000,--leaving two fifths in arrears. Virginia was
in somewhat worse condition than Pennsylvania; of $247,000 accrued
$136,000 had been paid,--leaving four ninths in arrears.
Yet Pennsylvania and Virginia paid taxes in their own depreciated bank
paper, while New York and New England paid chiefly in Treasury notes.
The new taxes were still to be paid in the same medium, although the
laws gave no express authority for it. In the next Congress, when the
subject was discussed, Wright of Maryland said:[368] “When Congress
passed the revenue laws and imposed the six million and three million
land tax, did they contemplate the payment of specie? No! they knew
the people had it not, and of course could not pay it.... Does any man
doubt that Congress intended these taxes being paid in bank paper? Nay,
has not the Secretary of the Treasury ... sealed this construction
of the law by taking the bank paper in discharge for these taxes?”
That the bank paper was worth less than Treasury notes was shown
by the Southern States paying their taxes in such paper, when they
might equally well have paid them in Treasury notes except for the
difference in value.
The medium of depreciated and depreciating bank paper in which the
taxes were to be paid, secured the States outside of New England from
intolerable pressure by giving the means of indefinite depreciation;
but to the government such a resource meant merely a larger variety
of bank-credits, which were of no certain value even in the towns
where the banks existed, and were of no value at all elsewhere. The
burden of taxation would be thrown chiefly on New England; and if the
Hartford Convention did nothing else, it was sure to take measures
for sequestering the proceeds of taxation in New England for military
purposes. The hope of restoring the finances by taxation was faint.
Until the currency could be established and exchanges made secure, the
government was helpless.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account