History of the United States of America, Volume 8 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 8 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
The American works, on the other
hand, remained as little injured as ever, and we were completely
foiled.”
Admiral Codrington, writing from the British headquarters three days
after the battle, expressed equal astonishment and annoyance:[544]--
“On the 1st we had our batteries, by severe labor, ready in
situations from which the artillery people were, as a matter
of course, to destroy and silence the opposing batteries, and
give opportunity for a well-arranged storm. But instead of so
doing, not a gun of the enemy appeared to suffer, and our firing
too high was not made out until we had expended too much of our
hardly-collected ammunition to push the matter further. Such a
failure in this boasted arm was not to be expected, and I think
it a blot in the artillery escutcheon.”
Codrington somewhat under-estimated the effect of the British fire.
Three of the American guns, including the thirty-two-pounder, were more
or less damaged, and the cotton-bales which formed the cheeks of the
embrasures proved to be as little serviceable as the hogsheads of sugar
in the British river battery.[545] Two artillery caissons were exploded
by the British rockets. Thirty-four men were killed or wounded; while
the British reported a loss of seventy-six killed and wounded between
Jan. 1 and 5, 1815, most of whom fell in the artillery battle.[546]
The British official reports said less, but their silence was equally
significant.
“Our batteries made little impression upon the enemy’s parapet,”
wrote Major Forrest.[547] “The order for the assault was
therefore not carried into effect. The troops remained in this
advanced position, and orders were given to retire the guns in
the night. The evening changed to wet, and the ground became in
consequence so deep that it required the exertions of the whole
army as a working-party, aided by the seamen, to retire the guns
a short distance before daylight. The army then fell back to the
position it occupied on the 31st.”
Admiral Cochrane’s official report was still more brief, and best
understood by the comments already quoted from his friend Admiral
Codrington:--
“On the 1st instant batteries were opened; but our fire not
having the desired effect, the attack was deferred until the
arrival of the troops under Major-General Lambert, which was
daily expected.”
If the Subaltern was right, the British defeat resulted in the loss of
several guns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account