History of the War in Afghanistan, Vol. 2 (of 3): Third EditionKaye, John William, Sir
History
History of the War in Afghanistan, Vol. 2 (of 3): Third Edition
Kaye, John William, Sir
Afghan Wars
The month of August, however, found the Envoy still cheerful and
sanguine. The convulsions of the Douranees and the spasms of the
Ghilzyes were regarded by him as the accompaniments only of those
infantine fevers which were inseparable from the existence of the
tribes. In vain Rawlinson, with steady eye watching those symptoms,
and probing with deep sagacity the causes of the mortal ailments out
of which arose all those fierce throes of anguish, protested that
throughout Western Afghanistan there was a strong national feeling
against us; and that difficulties and dangers were coiling their
serpent folds around us with irresistible force. Macnaghten still asked
what we had to fear, and thus, on the 2nd of August, addressed his less
sanguine colleague:
I am not going to read you a lecture, first, because when you indited
your letter of the 28th ult. you pleaded guilty to the influence of
bile; and secondly, because at the present writing I must own the same
impeachment; but I must pen a few remarks, in the hope of inducing you
to regard matters a little more “_couleur de rose_.” You say, “The
state of the country causes me many an anxious thought—we may thresh
the Douranees over and over again, but this rather aggravates than
obviates the difficulty of overcoming the national feeling against
us—in fact, our tenure is positively that of military possession,
and the French in Algiers, and the Russians in Circassia, afford
us an example on a small scale of the difficulty of our position.”
Now upon what do you found your assertion that there is a national
feeling against us, such as that against the French in Algiers or
the Russians in Circassia? Solely, so far as I know, because the
turbulent Douranees have risen in rebellion. From Mookoor to the
Khybur Pass all is content and tranquillity, and wherever we Europeans
go we are received with respect, and attention, and welcome. But the
insurrection of the Douranees is no new occurrence. The history of
the rule of the Barukzye Sirdars would show that they were engaged in
one continuous struggle with their turbulent brethren. If they were
able to reduce them to subjection with their contemptible means, what
should we have to fear from them? We have given them something to lose
which they had not before, and you may rely upon it that they will
be quiet enough as soon as they are satisfied (which they ought to
be pretty well by this time) of the futility of opposition, provided
some means are adopted of preventing Yar Mahomed from carrying on his
intrigues. Then, the Ghilzyes have been in arms. True. But it would
have been unreasonable to suppose that they should surrender their
independance without a struggle, and we have now put the bit in their
mouths. I do not concur with you as to the difficulty of our position.
On the contrary, I think our prospects are most cheering, and with the
materials we have there ought to be little or no difficulty in the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account