History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Don Thomas Morla, after a vain attempt to involve lord Collingwood
and sir Hew Dalrymple in the disgraceful transaction, formally
defended the conduct of the junta in breaking the capitulation; his
reasoning was worthy of the man who so soon afterwards betrayed his
own country with the same indifference to honour that he displayed
on this occasion.
OBSERVATIONS.
[Sidenote: Return of the French army. Appendix.]
1º. The gross amount of Dupont’s corps when it first entered
Spain was about twenty-four thousand men, with three thousand
five hundred horses; of these twenty-one thousand were fit for
duty. It was afterwards strengthened by a provisionary regiment of
cuirassiers, a marine battalion of the guard, and the two Swiss
regiments of Preux and Reding. It could not therefore have been
less than twenty-four thousand fighting men when Dupont arrived in
Andalusia, and as the whole of Vedel’s, and the greatest part of
Gobert’s division, had joined before the capitulation, and that
eighteen thousand men laid down their arms at Baylen, Dupont must
have lost by wounds, desertion, and deaths in hospital or the
field, above four thousand men.
2º. The order which directed this corps upon Cadiz was despatched
from Bayonne before the Spanish insurrection broke out; it was
therefore strange that Dupont should have persevered in his
march when he found affairs in such a different state from that
contemplated by Napoleon at the time the instructions for this
expedition were framed. If the emperor considered it necessary to
reinforce the division which marched under Dupont’s own command,
with a detachment from the army in Portugal before the insurrection
broke out, it was evident that he never could have intended that
that general should blindly follow the letter of his orders, when
a great and unexpected resistance was opposed to him, and that
the detachment of Portugal was unable to effect a junction. The
march to Cordoba was therefore an error, and it was a great error,
because Dupont confesses in his memoir that he advanced under the
conviction that his force was too weak to obtain success, and,
consequently, having no object, his operations could only lead to a
waste of lives.
3º. At Cordoba, Dupont remained in a state of torpor for ten days;
this was the second error of a series which led to his ruin: he
should either have followed up his victory and attacked Seville
in the first moment of consternation, or he should have retired
to Andujar while he might do so without the appearance of being
compelled to it. If he had followed the first plan, the city would
inevitably have fallen before him, and thus time would have been
gained for the arrival of the 2d and 3d division of his corps.
[Sidenote: Dupont’s Journal of Operations.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account