History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The retreat of the king was undoubtedly hasty and ill-considered;
whether as a military or political measure it was unwise.
Bessieres, with seventeen thousand victorious troops and forty
pieces of artillery, paralized the northern provinces, the Spanish
army of Andalusia was too distant from that of Valencia to concert
a combined movement, and if they had formed a junction their united
force could not have exceeded forty thousand fighting men, ill
provided, and commanded by jealous independent chiefs. Now the
king, without weakening Bessieres’s corps too much, could have
collected twenty thousand infantry, five thousand cavalry, and
eighty pieces of artillery, and the battle of Rio Seco shows what
such an army could have effected. Every motive of prudence and of
honour called for some daring action to wipe off the ignominy of
Baylen.
Let it be conceded that Joseph could not have maintained himself
in Madrid; the line of the Duero was the true position for
the French army. Taking Aranda as a centre, and occupying the
Somosierra, Segovia, Valladolid, Palencia, Burgos, and Soria on
the circumference; two ordinary marches would have carried the
king to the succour of any part of his position, and the northern
provinces would thus have been separated from the southern; for
Blake durst not have made a flank march to the Guadarama, Castaños
durst not have remained in the basin of Madrid, and the siege of
Zaragoza might have been continued, because from Aranda to Zaragoza
the distance is not greater than from Valencia or from Madrid, and
from Soria it is only three marches; hence the king could have
succoured Verdier in time if the Valencians attacked him, and it
was impossible for Castaños to have arrived at Zaragoza under a
month; now by taking up the line of the Ebro, Napoleon’s plan of
separating the provinces, and confining each to its own exertions,
was frustrated, and Joseph virtually resigned the throne; for
however doubtful the prudence of opposing the French might have
been considered before the retreat, it became imperative upon all
Spaniards to aid the energy of the multitude, when that energy was
proved to be efficient.
In this manner Napoleon’s first effort against Spain was
frustrated; not that he had miscalculated either the difficulties
of his task, or the means to overcome them; for although Bessieres
was the only general who perfectly succeeded in his operations,
the plan of the emperor was so well combined, that it required
the destruction of a whole army to shake it at all, and even when
the king, by committing the great faults of abandoning Madrid
and raising the siege of Zaragoza, had given the utmost force to
Dupont’s catastrophe; the political position only of the French was
weakened, their military hold of the country was scarcely loosened,
and the Spaniards were unable to follow up their victory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account