History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Spain, holding from time immemorial a high rank among the great
powers, and more often an oppressor than oppressed, haughtily
rejected all advice. Unconscious of her actual weakness and
ignorance, and remembering only her former dignity, she
ridiculously assumed an attitude which would scarcely have suited
her in the days of Charles V.; while Portugal, always fearing the
ambition of a powerful neighbour, and relying for safety as much
upon her alliances as upon her own intrinsic strength, was from
habit inclined to prudent calculation, and readily submitted to the
direction of England. The turbulence of the first led to defeat and
disaster; the docility and patience of the second were productive
of the most beneficial results.
The difference between these nations was, however, not immediately
perceptible, and at the period of the convention the Portuguese
were despised, while a splendid triumph was anticipated for the
Spaniards. It was affirmed and believed, that from every quarter
enthusiastic multitudes of the latter were pressing forward to
complete the destruction of a baffled and dispirited enemy; the
vigour, the courage, the unmatched spring of Spanish patriotism,
was in every man’s mouth, and Napoleon’s power and energy seemed
weak in opposition. Few persons doubted the truth of such tales,
and yet nothing could be more unsound, more eminently fallacious,
than the generally-entertained opinion of French weakness and of
Spanish strength. The resources of the former were unbounded,
almost untouched; those of the latter were too slender even to
support the weight of victory. In Spain the whole structure of
society was shaken to pieces by the violence of an effort which
merely awakened the slumbering strength of France: foresight,
promptitude, arrangement, marked the proceedings of Napoleon;
but with the Spaniards the counsels of prudence were punished as
treason; and personal interests, every where springing up with
incredible force, wrestled against the public good. At a distance,
the insurrection appeared of towering proportions and mighty
strength; but in truth it was a fantastic object, stained with
blood, and tottering from weakness, and the helping hand of England
alone was stretched forth for its support; all other assistance
was denied, for the continental powers, although nourishing secret
hopes of profit from the struggle, with calculating policy, turned
coldly from the patriots’ cause. The English cabinet was indeed
sanguine, and resolute to act; but the ministers while anticipating
success in a preposterous manner, displayed little industry and
less judgment in their preparations for the struggle; nor does it
appear that the real freedom of the Peninsula was much considered
in their councils. They contemplated this astonishing insurrection,
as a mere military opening through which Napoleon might be
assailed, and they neglected, or rather feared, to look towards the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account