History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The jarring interests which agitated the northern provinces were
not even subdued by the near approach of danger. The result of
the battle of Rio Seco rather inflamed than allayed the violence
of party feeling. If Bessieres had not been checked in his
operations by the disaster of Dupont, he would have encountered
few obstacles in establishing Joseph’s authority in Gallicia and
Old Castile. The enthusiasm of those provinces never rose to a
great pitch; Bessieres was prepared to use address as well as
force, and among the factions he must doubtless have found support.
The reinforcements continually arriving from France would have
enabled him to maintain his acquisition, and then the ability of
the emperor’s dispositions would have become apparent; for while
Bessieres held Gallicia, and Dupont hung on the southern frontier
of Portugal with twenty-five thousand men, Junot could have
securely concentrated his army in the neighbourhood of Lisbon,
and have rendered an English disembarkation on the coast nearly
impracticable.
[Sidenote: Azanza and O’Farril, Mem.]
The whole of the French monarch’s combinations were overturned by
the disgraceful capitulation of Baylen, and when Joseph evacuated
Madrid a fresh impulse was given to the spirit of the people;
but, unfortunately for Spain, as a wider scope for ambition was
obtained, the workings of self-interest increased, fresh parties
sprung up, and new follies and greater absurdities stifled the
virtue of the country, and produced irremediable confusion, ending
in ruin. The fact of Dupont’s capitulation was made known to the
council of Castile before king Joseph was informed of it, and
the council, foreseeing all the consequences of such an event,
immediately refused, as I have already related, to promulgate
officially his accession to the throne. Joseph permitted this act
of obedience to pass without much notice. He was naturally averse
to violence, and neither he, nor his brother Napoleon, did at any
period of the contest for Spain constrain a Spaniard to accept or
retain office under the intrusive government. Joseph went further;
before he abandoned Madrid, he released his ministers from their
voluntary oath of allegiance to himself, and left them free to
choose their party once more. Don Pedro Cevallos and the marquis
of Pinuelo changed with, what appeared to them, changing fortune;
but five others remained steadfast, preferring an ameliorated
government under a foreign prince to what they believed to be
a hopeless struggle, but which, if successful, they knew must
end in a degrading native despotism; perhaps, also, a little
swayed by their dislike to England, and by the impossibility of
obtaining that influence among their countrymen which, under other
circumstances, their talents and character would have ensured.
[Sidenote: Sir H. Dalrymple’s Papers. Coxe’s Correspondence.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account