History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
diplomatist, but no bar was thereby put to the discussion of
Spanish interests; the correspondence of the English minister would
not of necessity have compromised Spanish independence, it need not
have relaxed in the slightest degree the measures of hostility,
nor retarded the succours preparing for the patriots; and when
we consider the great power of Napoleon’s arms, the subtlety and
force of his genius, the good fortune which had hitherto attended
his progress in war, and the vast additional strength which the
alliance of Russia conferred at the moment, and when, to oppose
all this, we contrast the scanty means of Spain, and the confusion
into which she was plunged, it does appear as if her welfare would
have been better consulted by an appeal to negotiation rather
than to battle. It is true that Austria was arming; but Austria
had been so often conquered, was so sure to abandon the cause of
the patriots, and every other cause when pressed, so certain to
sacrifice every consideration of honour or faith to the suggestions
of self-interest, that the independence of Spain through the medium
of war could only be regarded as the object of uncertain hope, a
prize to be gained, if gained at all, by wading through torrents
of blood, and sustaining every misery that famine, and the fury
of devastating armies could inflict. To avoid, if possible, such
dreadful evils by negotiating was surely worth trial, and the
force of justice, when urged by the minister of a great nation,
would have been difficult to withstand; no power, no ambition can
resist it and be safe. But such an enlarged mode of proceeding was
not in accord with the shifts and subterfuges that characterized
the policy of the day[15], when it was thought wise to degrade
the dignity of such a correspondence by a ridiculous denial of
Napoleon’s titles; and praiseworthy to render a state paper, in
which such serious interests were discussed, offensive and mean
by miserable sarcasms, evincing the pride of an author more than
the gravity of a statesman. Mr. Whitbread declared in the House of
Commons that he saw no reason for refusing to treat with France at
that period; and although public clamour afterwards induced him to
explain away this expression, he had no reason to be ashamed of it;
for if the opinion of Cicero, that an unfair peace is preferable to
the justest war, was ever worthy of attention, it was so at this
period, when the success of Spain was doubtful, her misery certain,
her salvation only to be obtained through the baptism of blood!
[Sidenote: Imperial Decree, 11th Sept. 1808.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account