History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Joseph’s errors did not escape the animadversion of his brother,
whose sagacity enabled him, although at a distance, to detect,
through the glare of the insurrection, all the inefficiency of the
Spaniards; but, despising them as soldiers, he dreaded the moral
effect produced by their momentary success, and he was preparing
to crush the rising hopes of his enemies. Joseph’s retreat, and
subsequent position, therefore, displeased him; and he desired his
brother to check the exultation of the patriots, by acting upon a
bold and well-considered plan, of which he sent him the outline.
[Sidenote: Appendix, No. 5.]
His notes, dictated upon the occasion, are replete with genius,
and evince his absolute mastery of the art of war. “It was too
late,” he said, “to discuss the question, whether Madrid should
have been retained or abandoned? Idle to consider, if a position,
covering the siege of Zaragoza, might not have been formed; useless
to examine, if the line of the Douro was not better than that of
the Ebro for the French army. The line of the Ebro was actually
taken, and it must be kept; to advance from that river without a
fixed object would create indecision; this would bring the troops
back again, and produce an injurious moral effect; but why abandon
Tudela? Why relinquish Burgos? Those towns were of note, and of
reputation; the possession of them gave a moral influence, and
moral force constituted two-thirds of the strength of armies.
Tudela and Burgos had also a relative importance; the first
possessing a stone bridge, was on the communication of Pampeluna
and Madrid. It commanded the canal of Zaragoza. It was the capital
of a province. When the army resumed offensive operations, their
first enterprise would be the siege of Zaragoza; from that town to
Tudela, the land carriage was three days, but the water carriage
was only fourteen hours; wherefore to have the besieging artillery
and stores at Tudela was the same as to have them at Zaragoza. If
the Spaniards got possession of the former, all Navarre would be
in a state of insurrection, and Pampeluna exposed. Tudela then was
of vast importance; but Milagro was of none. It was an obscure
place, without a bridge, and commanding no communication; in
short, it was without interest, defended nothing! led to nothing!
A river,” said this great commander, “though it should be as
large as the Vistula, and as rapid as the Danube at its mouth,
is nothing, unless there are good points of passage, and a head
quick to take the offensive. The Ebro as a defence was less than
nothing, a mere line of demarcation! and Milagro was useless. The
enemy might neglect it, be at Estella, and from thence gain Tolosa,
before any preparation could be made to receive him; he might
come from Soria, from Logroña, or from Zaragoza. Again, Burgos
was the capital of a province, the centre of many communications,
a town of great fame, and of relative value to the French army.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account