History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
In the afternoon, Morla and another officer came out to demand
a suspension of arms, necessary, they said, to persuade the
people to surrender. Being admitted to the emperor’s presence, he
addressed Morla in terms of great severity; he reproached him for
his scandalous conduct towards Dupont’s army. “Injustice and bad
faith,” he exclaimed, “always recoil upon those who are guilty
of either.” This saying was well applied to that Spaniard, and
Napoleon himself confirmed its philosophic truth in after times.
“The Spanish ulcer destroyed me,” was an expression of deep anguish
which escaped from him in his own hour of misfortune.
Morla returned to the town: his story was soon told: before six
o’clock the next morning Madrid must surrender or perish. A
division of opinion arose; the violent excitement of the populace
was considerably abated, but the armed peasantry from the country,
and the poorest inhabitants, still demanded to be led against
the enemy. A constant fire was kept up from the houses in the
neighbourhood of the Prado; the French general Maison was wounded,
and general Bruyeres was killed; but the disposition to fight
became each moment weaker, and Morla and Castelfranco prepared a
capitulation. The captain-general Castellar refused to sign it, and
as the town was only invested on one side, he effected his escape
with the regular troops during the night, carrying with him sixteen
guns. The people now sunk into a quiescent state, and at eight
o’clock in the morning of the 4th, Madrid surrendered.
That Morla was a traitor there is no doubt, and his personal
cowardice was excessive; but Castelfranco appears to have been
rather weak and ignorant than treacherous, and certainly the
surrender of Madrid was no proof of his guilt; that event was
inevitable. The boasting uproar of the multitude when they are
permitted to domineer for a few days is not enthusiasm. The retreat
of Castellar with the troops of the line during the progress of
the negotiation was the wisest course to pursue, and proves that
he acquiesced in the propriety of surrendering. That the people
neither could nor would defend the city is quite evident, for it
is incredible that Morla and Castelfranco should have been able to
carry through a capitulation in so short a period, if the generals,
the regular troops, the armed peasantry, and the inhabitants, had
been all, or even a part of them, determined to resist.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account