History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
On the receipt of this despatch, sir Arthur Wellesley halted
at Merida for some days. He was able in that country to obtain
provisions, and he wished, if possible, to allay the excitement
occasioned by his retreat; but he refused to co-operate again with
the Spaniards. Want, he said, had driven him to separate from
them, but their shameful flight at Arzobispo would alone have
justified him for doing so. To take up a defensive position behind
the Guadiana would be useless, because that river was fordable,
and the ground behind it weak. The line of the Tagus, occupied at
the moment by Eguia, was so strong, that if the Spaniards could
defend any thing they might defend that. His advice then was that
they should send the pontoon-bridge to Badajos, and remain on the
defensive at Deleytoza and Almaraz. But, it might be asked, was
there no chance of renewing the offensive? To what purpose? The
French were as numerous, if not more so, than the allies; and, with
respect to the Spaniards at least, superior in discipline and every
military quality. To advance again was only to play the same losing
game as before. Baños and Perales must be guarded, or the bands in
Castile would again pour through upon the rear of the allied army;
but who was to guard these passes? The British were too few to
detach, and the Spaniards could not be trusted; and if they could,
Avila and the Guadarama passes remained, by which the enemy could
reinforce the army in front,--for there were no Spanish troops in
the north of Spain capable of making a diversion.
“But there was a more serious consideration, namely, the constant
and shameful misbehaviour of the Spanish troops before the
enemy. We, in England,” said sir Arthur, “never hear of their
defeats and flights, but I have heard Spanish officers telling
of nineteen or twenty actions of the description of that at the
bridge of Arzobispo, accounts of which, I believe, have never
been published.” “In the battle of Talavera,” he continued, “in
which the Spanish army, with very trifling exception, was not
engaged,--whole corps threw away their arms, and run off, when they
were neither attacked nor threatened with an attack. When these
dastardly soldiers run away they plunder every thing they meet.
In their flight from Talavera they plundered the baggage of the
British army, which was, at that moment, bravely engaged in their
cause.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account