History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
_Reports of colonel Donkin (quarter-master-general) to Sir J.
Cradock, March 21._
“I cannot, however, order officers of my department to check this
irregularity” (forcing quarters) “_when it originates solely in the
neglect of the Portuguese civil magistrates_; for troops will not
obey orders, which expose them wantonly to great privations.”
_Sir J. Cradock to Mr. Villiers, March 25._
“I have repeately urged this subject” (quarters of troops) “to the
regency, in the strongest manner, but, as you perceive, without
effect.”
_Sir J. Cradock to lord Castlereagh, March 17._
“Whatever suits the momentary purpose, upon the most superficial
view, seems to be the guide in the Portuguese councils. Ultimate
objects, which, in the course of things, must arrive, are never
brought into the calculation.”
_Cradock to Berkely, January 17._
“The regency seem to decline giving any specific directions
relative to the guns in fort St. Julian and the river batteries,
and, _above all, not to write any thing_; but they are very willing
to acquiesce in any thing we shall do, only anxious that, on a
future day, it _shall appear to be our act, not theirs_.”
_Admiral Berkely to sir J. Cradock, February 19, 1809._
“I imagine Mr. Villiers has transmitted a copy of the extraordinary
note sent him by the regency; in which they complain of the conduct
of the artillery-officer who dismantled the Bugio fort, and
intimate their intention of sending for all the guns and powder
from fort St. Julian; and add many particulars, as novel as they
are suspicious.”--“Whether the language of this note arises from
duplicity, or any other cause, it is equally to be resisted; and,
therefore, stated some facts which may be retorted upon them, and
which will not place their conduct in the _most favourable point of
view towards either their own sovereign or Great Britain_.”
_Extract from an official note, drawn up by sir John Cradock,
Lisbon, February 20, 1809._
“It was told me, two or three times, by Mr. Villiers, that M.
Forjas, or some other member of the regency, had expressed extreme
solicitude about the forts on the Tagus, &c.”--“I always urged Mr.
Villiers to get from M. Forjas, or any other member, a declaration
of what they wished, that we might exactly conform to it; for
they seemed to be anxious to go beyond what we should venture to
propose. Mr. Villiers, after some time, told me that the Portuguese
government were _unwilling to put down any thing upon paper_, or
give any specific instruction; but they would willingly leave
all the arrangement to us.”--“After the above statement, which I
declare, upon my honour, to be the accurate description of what has
passed, I must express my surprise, and even indignation, at the
protest now made by the regency; and when it is considered that the
Bugio fort is often inaccessible for a week together, this part of
their complaint is shameful to the highest degree. _Their general
object is, however, to be distinguished._”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account