History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
OBSERVATIONS.--1º. General St. Cyr’s marches were hardy, his
battles vigorous and delivered in right time and place; but his
campaign, as a whole, may be characterised as one of great efforts
without corresponding advantages. He himself attributes this to the
condition of the seventh corps, destitute and neglected, because
_the emperor disliked and wished to ruin its chief_; a strange
accusation, and unsustained by reason or facts. What! Napoleon
wilfully destroy his own armies! sacrifice forty thousand men,
that a general, who he was not obliged to employ at all, might be
disgraced! General St. Cyr acknowledges, that when he received his
instructions from the emperor, he observed the affliction of the
latter at the recent loss of Dupont’s force; yet he would have it
believed, that, in the midst of this regret, that monarch, with
a singular malice, was preparing greater disasters for himself,
merely to disgrace the general commanding the seventh corps,
and why? because the latter had formerly served with the army of
the Rhine! Yet St. Cyr met with no reverses in Catalonia, and was
afterwards made a marshal by this implacable enemy.
2º.--That the seventh corps was not well supplied, and that its
commander was thereby placed in a difficult situation, is not to be
disputed in the face of the facts stated by general St. Cyr; but
if war were a state of ease and smoothness, the fame which attends
successful generals would be less. Napoleon selected general St.
Cyr because he thought him a capable commander; in feeble hands,
he knew the seventh corps would be weak, but, with St. Cyr at its
head, he judged it sufficient to overcome the Catalonians; nor was
he much mistaken. Barcelona, the great object of solicitude, was
saved; Rosas was taken; and if Tarragona and Tortosa did not also
fall, the one after the battle of Molino del Rey, the other after
that of Valls, it was because the French general did not choose to
attack them. Those towns were without the slightest preparation
for defence, moral or physical, and must have surrendered; nor
can the unexpected and stubborn resistance of Gerona, Zaragoza,
and Valencia be cited against this opinion. The latter cities
were previously prepared and expectant of a siege; and yet, in
every instance, except Valencia, there was a moment of dismay and
confusion, not fatal, only because the besieging generals wanted
that ready vigour which is the characteristic of great commanders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account