History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
But there was in England a powerful, and as recent events have
proved, a most unprincipled parliamentary opposition, and there were
two parties in the cabinet. The one headed by lord Wellesley, who
was anxious to push the war vigorously in the Peninsula, without
much regard to the ultimate pressure upon the people of his own
country; the other, headed by Mr. Perceval, who sought only to
maintain himself in power. Narrow, harsh, factious, and illiberal,
in every thing relating to public matters, this man’s career was
one of unmixed evil. His bigotry taught him to oppress Ireland, but
his religion did not deter him from passing a law to prevent the
introduction of medicines into France during a pestilence. He lived
by faction; he had neither the wisdom to support, nor the manliness
to put an end to, the war in the Peninsula, and his crooked,
contemptible policy was shown, by withholding what was necessary to
sustain the contest, and throwing on the general the responsibility
of failure.
[Sidenote: Appendix, No. IV.]
With all the fears of little minds, he and his coadjutors awaited
the result of lord Wellington’s operations in 1810. They affected to
dread his rashness, yet could give no reasonable ground for their
alarm; and their private letters were at variance with their public
instructions, that they might be prepared for either event. They
deprived him, without notice, of his command over the troops, at
Cadiz; they gave Graham power to furnish pecuniary succours to the
Spaniards at that place, which threw another difficulty in the way
of obtaining money for Portugal; and when Wellington complained of
the attention paid to the unfounded apprehension of some superior
officers more immediately about him, he was plainly told that those
officers were better generals than himself. At the same time he was,
from a pitiful economy, ordered to dismiss the transports on which
the safety of the army depended in the event of failure.
Between these factions there was a constant struggle, and lord
Wellington’s successes in the field, only furthered the views of
Mr. Perceval, because they furnished ground for asserting that due
support had been given to him. Indeed such a result is to be always
apprehended by English commanders. The slightest movement in war
requires a great effort, and is attended with many vexations, which
the general feels acutely and unceasingly; but the politician,
believing in no difficulties because he feels none, neglects the
supplies, charges disaster on the general, and covers his misdeeds
with words. The inefficient state of the cabinet under both Mr.
Canning and Mr. Perceval may however be judged of by the following
extracts, the writers of which as it is easy to perceive were in
official situations.
[Sidenote: A. April. 1810.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account