History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
the colonies and to cut off the English trade; and it was done
also at a moment, when the regency was unable to transport Blake’s
army from Cadiz to the Condado di Niebla without the assistance of
British vessels. “It was difficult,” Lord Wellesley said, “to state
an instance in which the prejudices and jealousy of individuals had
occasioned so much confusion of every maxim of discretion and good
policy, and so much danger to the acknowledged mutual interests of
two great states engaged in a defensive alliance against the assaults
of a foreign foe”:—“Spain could not expect England to concur in a
continuance of a system by which, at her own expense, her trade was
injured, and by which Spain was making efforts not against the French
but against the main sources of her own strength.”
[Sidenote: June.]
After these instructions, which were given before the constitution
of Spain was arranged by the cortes, Mr. Wellesley pressed the
mediation upon Mr. Bardaxi the Spanish minister, who agreed to accept
it upon condition, that Mexico, which had not yet declared a form
of government, should be excepted,—that England should immediately
break off all intercourse with the colonies, and, if the mediation
failed, should assist Spain to reconquer them. When the injustice
and bad policy of this proposition was objected to, Mr. Bardaxi
maintained that it was just and politic, and pressed it as a secret
article; he however finally offered to accept the mediation, if Mr.
Wellesley would only pledge England to break off the intercourse
of trade. This was refused, and the negotiation continued, but as
Bardaxi asserted, that lord Wellington had before agreed to the
propriety of England going to war with the colonies, Mr. Wellesley
referred to the latter, and that extraordinary man, while actually
engaged with the enemy, under most critical circumstances, was thus
called upon to discuss so grave and extensive a subject. But it was
on such occasions that all his power of mind was displayed, and his
manner of treating this question proved, that in political, and even
in commercial affairs, his reach of thought and enlarged conceptions,
immeasurably surpassed the cabinet he served. And when we consider
that his opinions, stated in 1811, have been since verified in all
points to the very letter, it is impossible not to be filled with
admiration of his foresight and judgment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account