History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Amongst the other follies of the Portuguese regency was a resolution
to issue proclamations, filled with bombastic adulation of
themselves, vulgar abuse of the French, and altogether unsuited to
the object of raising the public feeling, which flagged under their
system. To the English general’s remonstrances on this head, Forjas
replied, that praise of themselves and abuse of the French, was the
national custom, and could not be dispensed with! a circumstance
which certain English writers who have implicitly followed the
accounts of the Portuguese authors, such as Accursio de Neves, and
men of his stamp, relative to French enormities, would do well to
consider. And here it is right to observe, that so many complaints
were made of the cruelty committed by Massena’s army while at
Santarem, that lord Wellington had some thoughts of reprisals; but
having first caused strict inquiry to be made, it was discovered that
in most cases, the _ordenança_, after having submitted to the French,
and received their protection, took advantage of it to destroy the
stragglers and small detachments, and the cruelty complained of was
only the infliction of legitimate punishment for such conduct: the
projected retaliation was therefore changed for an injunction to the
_ordenanças_ to cease from such a warfare.
The character of the regency was, however, most openly shewn in
their proceedings connected with the convention of Cintra. All the
advantages which that treaty ensured to Portugal, they complacently
reaped, but overlooked or annulled those points in which the
character of England was concerned. In violation of the convention,
and in despite of the remonstrances of lord Wellington and Mr.
Stuart, they cast the French residents at Lisbon into loathsome
dungeons, without any cause of complaint; and in the affair of
Mascarheñas their conduct was distinguished alike by wanton cruelty
and useless treachery. This youth, when only fifteen, had with
many others entered the French service in Junot’s time, under the
permission of his own prince; and he and the Conde de Sabugal, were
taken by the peasantry in 1810 endeavouring to pass from Massena’s
army into Spain, Sabugal in uniform, Mascarheñas in disguise. They
were both tried as traitors. The first, a general officer, and with
powerful friends amongst the Fidalgos, was acquitted, as indeed
was only just; but he was then appointed to a situation under the
regency, which was disgraceful, as arising from faction: Mascarheñas
was a boy, and had no powerful friends, and he was condemned to
death. Lord Wellington and Mr. Stuart represented the injustice of
this sentence, and they desired that if humanity was unheeded the
government would put him to death as a spy, for being in disguise,
and so prevent the danger of reprisals, already threatened by
Massena. The young man’s mother and sisters, grovelling in the dust,
implored the regency to spare him, but to shew their hatred of lord
Wellington and Mr.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account