History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The storming party, commanded by major M‘Intosh, of the 85th
regiment, was preceded by a forlorn hope under Mr. Dyas, of the
51st, and this gallant gentleman, guided by the engineer Forster, a
young man of uncommon bravery, reached the glacis about midnight,
and descended the ditch without being discovered. The French had,
however, cleared all the rubbish away, the breach had still seven
feet of perpendicular wall, many obstacles, such as carts chained
together and pointed beams of wood, were placed above it, and
large shells were ranged along the ramparts to roll down upon the
assailants. The forlorn hope finding the opening impracticable, was
retiring with little loss, when the main body, which had been exposed
to a flank fire, from the town as well as a direct fire from the
fort, came leaping into the ditch with ladders, and another effort
was made to escalade at different points; the ladders were too short,
and the garrison, consisting of only seventy-five men, besides
the cannoneers, made so stout a resistance, and the confusion and
mischief occasioned by the bursting of the shells was so great, that
the assailants again retired with the loss of more than one hundred
men.
[Sidenote: Lamarre’s Sieges.]
Bad success always produces disputes, and the causes of this failure
were attributed by some to the breach being impracticable from the
first; by others to the confusion which arose after the main body
had entered. French writers affirm that the breach was certainly
practicable on the night of the 5th, but repaired on the 6th; that
as the besiegers did not attack until midnight, the workmen had
time to clear the ruins away and to raise fresh obstacles, and the
bravery of the soldiers, who were provided with three muskets each,
did the rest. But it is also evident, that whether from inexperience,
accident, or other causes, the combinations for the assault were not
very well calculated; the storming party was too weak, the ladders
few and short, and the breach not sufficiently scoured by the fire of
the batteries. The attack itself was also irregular and ill-combined,
for the leading troops were certainly repulsed before the main body
had descended the ditch. The intrepidity of the assailants was
admitted by all sides, yet it is a great point in such attacks that
the supports should form almost one body with the leaders, because
the sense of power derived from numbers is a strong incentive to
valour, and obstacles which would be insurmountable to a few, seem to
vanish before a multitude. It is also to be recollected that this was
a case where not loss of men, but time was to be considered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account