History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
2º. The audacious manner in which Wellington stormed the redoubt of
Francisco, and broke ground on the first night of the investment;
the more audacious manner in which he assaulted the place before the
fire of the defence had been in any manner lessened, and before the
counterscarp had been blown in; were the true causes of the sudden
fall of the place. Both the military and political state of affairs
warranted this neglect of rules. The final success depended more upon
the courage of the troops than the skill of the engineer; and when
the general terminated his order for the assault, with this sentence,
“Ciudad Rodrigo _must_ be stormed this evening,” he knew well that
it would be nobly understood. Yet the French fought bravely on the
breach, and by their side many British deserters, desperate men, were
bayonetted.
3º. The great breach was cut off from the town by a perpendicular
descent of sixteen feet, and the bottom was planted with sharp
spikes, and strewn with live shells; the houses behind were all
loop-holed, and garnished with musketeers, and on the flanks there
were cuts, not indeed very deep or wide and the French had left the
temporary bridges over them, but behind were parapets so powerfully
defended that it was said the third division could never have carried
them, had not the light division taken the enemy in flank: an
assertion perhaps easier made than proved.
4º. The rapid progress of the allies on this occasion, has been
contrasted with the slow proceedings of Massena in 1810, and the
defence of Herrasti has been compared with that of Barrié. But
Massena was not pressed for time, and he would have been blameable
to have spared labour at the expense of blood; Herrasti also had
a garrison of six thousand men, whereas Barrié had less than two
thousand, of which only seventeen hundred were able to bear arms,
and he had additional works to guard. Nevertheless his neglect of
the lesser breach was a great error; it was so narrow and high,
that a very slight addition to its defences would have rendered it
quite impracticable; and as the deserters told him in the morning
of the 19th that the light division was come up, out of its turn,
he must have expected the assault and had time to prepare for it.
Moreover the small breach was flanked at a very short distance, by
a demi-bastion with a parapet, which, though little injured, was
abandoned when the head of the storming party had forced their way on
to the rampart. But the true way of defending Ciudad was by external
operations, and it was not until it fell, that the error of Marmont
at Elbodon could be judged in its full extent. Neither can that
marshal be in any manner justified for having left so few men in
Ciudad Rodrigo; it is certain that with a garrison of five thousand
the place would not have been taken, for when there are enough of men
the engineer’s art cannot be overcome by mere courage.
[Sidenote: Captain Cooke’s Memoirs, vol. i. p. 122.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account