History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
But ultimate consequences were never considered by the British
ministers; the immediate object was to procure money, and by
virtually making bank-notes a legal tender, they secured unlimited
means at home, through the medium of loans and taxes, which the
corruption of the parliament, insured to them, and which, by a
reaction, insured the corruption of the parliament. This resource
failed abroad. They could, and did, send to all the allies of
England, enormous supplies in kind, because to do so, was, in the
way of contracts, an essential part of the system of corruption at
home; a system aptly described, as bribing one-half of the nation
with the money of the other half, in order to misgovern both. Specie
was however only to be had in comparatively small quantities, and
at a premium so exorbitant, that even the most reckless politician
trembled for the ultimate consequences.
The foreign policy of the government was very simple, namely, to
bribe all powers to wear down France. Hence to Russia every thing,
save specie, was granted; and hence also, amicable relations with
Sweden were immediately re-established, and the more readily that
this power had lent herself to the violation of the continental
system by permitting the entry of British goods at Stralsund; but
wherever wisdom, or skill, was required, the English minister’s
resources failed altogether. With respect to Sicily, Spain, and
Portugal, this truth was notorious; and to preserve the political
support of the trading interests at home, a degrading and deceitful
policy, quite opposed to the spirit of lord Wellington’s counsels,
was followed in regard to the revolted Spanish colonies.
The short-sighted injustice of the system was however most glaring
with regard to the United States of America. Mutual complaints,
the dregs of the war of independence, had long characterised the
intercourse between the British and American governments, and these
discontents were turned into extreme hatred by the progress of the
war with France. The British government in 1806 proclaimed, contrary
to the law of nations, a blockade of the French coast, which could
not be enforced. Napoleon, in return, issued the celebrated decrees
of Berlin and Milan, which produced the no less celebrated orders in
council. The commerce of all neutrals was thus extinguished by the
arrogance of the belligerents; but the latter very soon finding that
their mutual convenience required some relaxation of mutual violence,
granted licenses to each other’s ships, and by this scandalous
evasion of their own policy, caused the whole of the evil to fall
upon the neutral, who was yet called the friend of both parties.
[Sidenote: 18th June, 1812.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account