History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“_The disorders which these soldiers have, are of a very trifling
description, they are considered to render them incapable of serving
with their regiments, but they certainly do not incapacitate them
from committing outrages of all descriptions on their passage through
the country, and in the last movements of the hospitals the soldiers
have not only plundered the inhabitants of their property, but the
hospital stores which moved with the hospitals, and have sold the
plunder. And all these outrages are committed with impunity, no proof
can be brought on oath before a court-martial that any individual
has committed an outrage, and the soldiers of the army are becoming
little better than a band of robbers._” “_I have carried the
establishment and authority of the provost-marshal as far as either
will go; there are at this moment not less than one provost-marshal,
and nineteen assistant provost-marshals, attached to the several
divisions of cavalry and infantry and to the hospital stations, to
preserve order, but this establishment is not sufficient, and I have
not the means of increasing it._”
The principal remedies he proposed, were the admitting less rigorous
proof of guilt, before courts martial; the forming a military police,
_such as the French, and other armies possessed_; the enforcing more
attention on the part of the officers to their duties; the increasing
the pay and responsibility of the non-commissioned officers, and the
throwing upon them the chief care of the discipline. But in treating
this part of the subject he broached an opinion which can scarcely be
sustained even by his authority. Assuming, somewhat unjustly, that
the officers of his army were, from consciousness of like demerit,
generally too lenient in their sentences on each other for neglect
of duty, he says, “I am inclined to entertain the opinion that in
the British army duties of inspection and control over the conduct
and habits of the soldiers, the performance of which by somebody
is the only effectual check to disorder and all its consequences,
are imposed upon the subaltern officers of regiments, which duties
British officers, being of the class of gentlemen in society, and
being required to appear as such, have never performed _and which
they will never perform_. It is very necessary, however, that the
duties should be performed by somebody, and for this reason, and
having observed the advantage derived in the guards, from the
respectable body of non-commissioned officers in those regiments,
who perform all the duties required from subalterns in the marching
regiments, I had suggested to your lordship the expediency of
increasing the pay of the non-commissioned officers in the army.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account